# Areta Delegate Platform

**URL:** <https://governance.aave.com/t/areta-delegate-platform/16780>\
**Category:** Delegate Platforms\
**Created:** [February 28, 2024, 6:27pm UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/areta-delegate-platform/16780 "2024-02-28T18:27:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 533

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sid\_areta](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/governance.aave.com/sid_areta/32/5220_2.png) [@sid\_areta](https://governance.aave.com/u/sid_areta)\
**Post date:** [May 9, 2025, 11:44am UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/areta-delegate-platform/16780/533 "2025-05-09T11:44:00Z")

</div>

**[ARFC] Deploy Aave on Soneium**

_Vote Result_: YES

_ **Rationale** _

This is the ARFC for this [Snapshot TEMP CHECK](https://v1.snapshot.box/#/aave.eth/proposal/0x1cf57949e6df159ab8a06b40a16be0a851e3028bce1d8ec8f254b3b9c7716080) that we voted in favour of according to our rationale [here](https://governance.aave.com/t/areta-delegate-platform/16780/436). Furthermore, both risk providers support the proposal.

Soneium’s user activity and TVS has increased gradually since launch, and there is a clear focus on mainstream adoption via existing IP, reflected by the focus on IP protection in SBS Labs’ T&Cs, which could allow Aave to expand to more real-world use cases. A concern for us is that liquidity is still low on Soneium and revenue opportunity at the moment is limited; in terms of risk, however, the liquidity issue can be mitigated by listing only stablecoins and WETH for the moment. Therefore, we will vote YES in favour of this proposal.

---

_[View the full topic](https://governance.aave.com/t/areta-delegate-platform/16780)._