# \[ARFC\] Aave Umbrella - activation

**URL:** <https://governance.aave.com/t/arfc-aave-umbrella-activation/21521>\
**Category:** Development\
**Created:** [March 20, 2025, 11:43am UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/arfc-aave-umbrella-activation/21521 "2025-03-20T11:43:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bgdlabs](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/governance.aave.com/bgdlabs/32/1829_2.png) [@bgdlabs](https://governance.aave.com/u/bgdlabs)\
**Post date:** [March 21, 2025, 7:52am UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/arfc-aave-umbrella-activation/21521/11 "2025-03-21T07:52:33Z")

</div>

Hi @0xmonk. That is more a topic to decide on the Aavenomics side and not exactly Umbrella, but in general, yes, we think that in terms of slashing for covering deficit, stkAAVE and stkABPT don’t need any cooldown.

We have proposed an idea for the initial TEMP CHECK of the Aavenomics of [slashing hooks](https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-aavenomics-update/18379/4) that could potentially reintroduce stkAAVE/stkABPT into the picture, but that requires quite some extra discussion and will not be introduced to start with on the Aavenomics.

---

_[View the full topic](https://governance.aave.com/t/arfc-aave-umbrella-activation/21521)._