# \[ARFC\] Adjusting WBTC Parameters to Address BitGO Transition Risks

**URL:** <https://governance.aave.com/t/arfc-adjusting-wbtc-parameters-to-address-bitgo-transition-risks/19096>\
**Category:** Governance\
**Created:** [September 18, 2024, 1:59pm UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/arfc-adjusting-wbtc-parameters-to-address-bitgo-transition-risks/19096 "2024-09-18T13:59:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MarcZeller](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/governance.aave.com/marczeller/32/7124_2.png) [@MarcZeller](https://governance.aave.com/u/MarcZeller)\
**Post date:** [September 19, 2024, 7:11am UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/arfc-adjusting-wbtc-parameters-to-address-bitgo-transition-risks/19096/4 "2024-09-19T07:11:20Z")

</div>

Hello, We thanks @LlamaRisk for this analysis.

As said earlier, wBTC users are legitimate users of the aave protocol.

The @ACI will not support any scenario hurting them beyond absolute necessity. We are in favor of including diversity (if governance approves it, cbBTC and tBTC will join Aave on Monday) and, if needed, creating incentives to migrate positions by both push and pull factors.

The proposed plan is too harsh, and we will not vote for it.

We do echo the part about limiting wBTC growth with a supply cap cut.

---

_[View the full topic](https://governance.aave.com/t/arfc-adjusting-wbtc-parameters-to-address-bitgo-transition-risks/19096)._