[ARFC] Deploy Aave V3 to MegaETH

Governance New Market
2

Hello and thanks for putting this proposal up again.

I have a few questions.

  1. Have all assets listed here been checked and approved under the AAcA?
    Cause some assets seem a bit weird to me to be considered to be added. Or I am looking at the wrong asset, as no contract has been provided here (not all are available but still confusing to understand which asset is meant).

  2. Why is Aave Labs receiving these points and not ACI? ACI developed a great tool for this kind of incentive distribution and if i remember correct they even used it for the Ink deployment. Also what does “Aave DAO GTM strategy” mean?
    I have never heard of that in the context of distributing funds/points/incentives. Clarification here would be great for the DAO.

Also the text says

Can you confirm that these points will be distributed to Aave User and won’t be retained by Aave Labs in any way?

  1. Risk manager should now evaluate, just as usual at the ARFC stage the assets to see if these are suitable to be onboarded on Aave, not after the AIP has been voted on. Thats the process the DAO follows and should be followed here as well.

  2. Has the technical evaluation by BGDLabs already started to see if MegaETH is a suitable candidate?

  3. Is there any type of COI, as it wasn’t ruled out here? Is Aave Labs or member of it being compensated by MegaETH or anyhow affiliated with them?
    This should always be included in the Disclaimer, just like all the other SP are doing it.

  4. Under the context of the Aave Labs renewal you are a technical SP and not responsible for growth. See here

    image
    image786×242 25.4 KB

    Growth initiatives should be done by the explicitly chosen SP for this. Otherwise this will create and end up in overlapping work. Additionally it will create confusion when other protocols want to work together with the Aave DAO and don’t know who to contact. I myself help onboarding other teams and would like to keep it clear for myself as well.
    Thats why im not doing these proposals myself, as it hurts the current established and well working workflow with Skywards.

Thank you, looking forward to your answer.

10 Likes