# Avalanche Market - add sAVAX to aave v3, raise LTV of AVAX

**URL:** <https://governance.aave.com/t/avalanche-market-add-savax-to-aave-v3-raise-ltv-of-avax/7588>\
**Category:** New Asset\
**Created:** [March 20, 2022, 12:17am UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/avalanche-market-add-savax-to-aave-v3-raise-ltv-of-avax/7588 "2022-03-20T00:17:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eboado](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/governance.aave.com/eboado/32/2268_2.png) [@eboado](https://governance.aave.com/u/eboado)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2022, 3:31pm UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/avalanche-market-add-savax-to-aave-v3-raise-ltv-of-avax/7588/14 "2022-03-25T15:31:13Z")

</div>

With v3 already present, taking into account the isolation mode, the community should be open to more frequent listings. But I think that should just influence voting more frequently Yes, not on lowering governance requirements.  
Regarding the framework, I think it is better to keep the same parameters for all chains, for all decisions (listing included), in what concerns the short executor.  
Basically 2 different models:

- **Primary**. Forum → Snapshot (lower requirements than on-chain) → on-chain governance
- **Temporary**. For all cases where for technical reasons Primary can’t be applied yet. So Forum → Snapshot (strict requirements) → Guardian executing. Any proposal that doesn’t fulfill the defined requirements on Snapshot, is automatically identified as Failed.

And yes, it could create a bit of confusion, but it is definitely way more confusing not having any “source of truth” for procedures as important as this for the community.

---

_[View the full topic](https://governance.aave.com/t/avalanche-market-add-savax-to-aave-v3-raise-ltv-of-avax/7588)._