We have noticed that the running proposal 208 would create an inconsistency on the configured parameters _flashLoanPremiumTotal and _flashLoanPremiumToProtocol, compared with the live ones on the Pool contracts.
Even if not damaging to the protocol and possible to fix via an additional proposal afterward, we consider any inconsistency enough to cancel the proposal, so we have coordinated to lose the proposition power, for 208 to be eligible for cancelation.
We will be re-submitting this upgrade early next week.