# Chaos Labs Is Leaving Aave **URL:** \ **Category:** General\ **Created:** [April 6, 2026, 4:04pm UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/chaos-labs-is-leaving-aave/24386 "2026-04-06T16:04:13Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 14
**Author:** ![MikeZacharski](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a183cd/32.png) [@MikeZacharski](https://governance.aave.com/u/MikeZacharski)\ **Post date:** [April 6, 2026, 9:26pm UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/chaos-labs-is-leaving-aave/24386/14 "2026-04-06T21:26:30Z")
Appreciate the transparency from Chaos here. Regardless of where people land on the underlying disagreement, I think one takeaway for the DAO is that V4 raises the bar for what the risk stack needs to look like. If the protocol is moving toward a more interdependent, system-level risk surface, this may be a good moment to think not only about who fills the formal risk provider role, but also whether Aave should add new tooling layers that can complement steward-driven parameter management with more continuous, forward-looking signals. In that spirit, I shared a temp check on whether Allora could be evaluated as a complementary predictive risk layer for Aave, not as a presumptive replacement for existing providers, but as an additional input the DAO may want to consider as it thinks through the next version of the risk stack: [https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-onboard-allora-network-as-an-aave-risk-service-provider/24392](https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-onboard-allora-network-as-an-aave-risk-service-provider/24392) Would welcome feedback there from anyone who thinks predictive volatility, liquidity, or liquidation-risk inference could be useful alongside the more traditional risk-provider model. --- _[View the full topic](https://governance.aave.com/t/chaos-labs-is-leaving-aave/24386)._