So we do now have two sGHO proposal that are same but different?
You are proposing to
While in this proposal [TEMP CHECK] GHO Aave Savings Upgrade its like this
To minimise risk, deposited GHO will remain in the sGHO contract and shall not be deployed to generated yield. This ensures liquidity is always available for users to withdraw and users are not exposed to any protocol risk.
So the question is which way to go now?
One option is giving more yield while the other one more security from my understanding.
Then you said that this proposal
What has been stated? And how does this complement the other proposal?
YieldMaestro and the cross-chain integration seem like a great feature and should be very helpful.
Have these two proposal been worked on together? Did each team know about it? Cause it should have been, because right now we have two different solutions with each having its pros and cons, although the other proposal has already been voted on and is one step ahead.
Its now important on how to merge these and get the best for the DAO in a safe and secure manner.
If I got it totally wrong then please let me know, appreciate it.