# Gauntlet recommendation to freeze CRV and set CRV LTV -\> 0 on Aave v2

**URL:** <https://governance.aave.com/t/gauntlet-recommendation-to-freeze-crv-and-set-crv-ltv-0-on-aave-v2/13644>\
**Category:** Risk\
**Created:** [June 12, 2023, 7:49pm UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/gauntlet-recommendation-to-freeze-crv-and-set-crv-ltv-0-on-aave-v2/13644 "2023-06-12T19:49:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ChaosLabs](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/governance.aave.com/chaoslabs/32/6850_2.png) [@ChaosLabs](https://governance.aave.com/u/ChaosLabs)\
**Post date:** [June 13, 2023, 7:58pm UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/gauntlet-recommendation-to-freeze-crv-and-set-crv-ltv-0-on-aave-v2/13644/8 "2023-06-13T19:58:43Z")

</div>

While freezing the asset may prevent the situation from worsening, it doesn’t alleviate the potential risk to the protocol. We are running simulations and analyses to devise a more structured strategy moving forward, to optimize the following:

1. Gradually reducing the LT for CRV on V2 to reduce borrowing power and exposure.
2. Lowering the debt ceiling on V3 - this action will reduce the potential exposure throughout the protocol.
3. Raising the RF for CRV on V2 - this will have a very minor impact as borrows are currently disabled on V2, and the current total borrows stand at around 36M CRV. However, it will present a more appropriate reward for the protocol, given the risk the asset presents.

---

_[View the full topic](https://governance.aave.com/t/gauntlet-recommendation-to-freeze-crv-and-set-crv-ltv-0-on-aave-v2/13644)._
