Rationale: Voted yes with same reason on Snapshot vote. This proposal can make treasury management smoother and faster while keeping things secure. Aave DAO can stay in control but move with more flexibility.
Rationale: Same reason with Snapshot vote. Adding eBTC/WBTC with E-Mode could bring in more users from other platforms with better borrowing rates. I support this proposal
Rationale: Onboarding USDtb to Aave can boost liquidity, attracting new users, and expanding the platform’s offerings. It also helps strengthen Aave’s reputation with high-quality assets.
Rationale: I think adding AAVE to Base will make the Aave more attractive to both existing and new users, especially for those looking to use AAVE as collateral.
The liquidity on Base will also boost flashloan activity, increasing transaction fee revenue.
Rationale: Voted for with same reason on Snapshot vote. Letting users borrow sDAI and adding E-mode for USDC.e/sDAI can boost lending activity and bring more users to Aave.
Also raising the Borrow Cap for sDAI can gain more fees.
Rationale: I support this proposal due to its growth potential and strategic importance for Aave.
However, liquidity risks, interest rate volatility, and the complexities of integrating the first PT token need careful monitoring before going onchain vote
Rationale: I voted yes on the ARFC with same reason on TEMCHECK. Adding stS to Aave v3 on Sonic will bring value and unlock growth opportunities for Aave DAO, helping attract liquidity and strengthen Aave’s position on Sonic.
Rationale: I support this proposal in TEMPCHECK. Onboarding tETH can boost Aave’s revenue potential, enhance capital efficiency, and position the protocol at the center of the growing restaking ecosystem.
First of all, it’s a much stronger version than the previous one, with better alignment and more upside for the DAO.
RWAs are an extremely important revenue exposure for the Aave DAO, and Horizon gives us a credible path to scale it, without compromising the permissionless core of the protocol. Moreover, the 50/50 revenue split is fair, and using GHO as a borrowing asset for institutions makes a lot of sense and helps push GHO adoption in the right direction.
I also feel good with the operational setup: giving the DAO control over the instance while letting Aave Labs manage execution and risk decisions.
This feels like the right step for Aave to stay ahead in the evolving DeFi x RWA landscape.
Rationale: Voting yes as these changes strike a good balance between risk management and capital efficiency. The new eModes introduced with Aave v3.2 are a strong upgrade to limit abuse while still allowing users to make the most of their collateral. Well-aligned with experts’s recommendations.
Rationale: Voting yes with same reason on Snapshot vote. rlUSD will add a safe new asset to Aave, help grow liquidity, and bring Ripple’s users to the platform.
Rationale: Voted yes with same reason with Tempcheck. Onboarding USDtb to Aave can boost liquidity, attracting new users, and expanding the platform’s offerings.
Rationale: I am voting yes in this ARFC since this can bring a big opportunity for Aave to grow TVL, boost revenue from borrow fees, and stay ahead in DeFi.
Rationale: Fully support this renewal as same reason with Snapshot vote. LlamaRisk has consistently delivered valuable risk analysis, security insights, and regulatory research for Aave.
Rationale: Voted yes for the same reason as in the Snapshot. Adding stS to Aave v3 on Sonic will bring value and unlock growth opportunities for Aave DAO, helping attract liquidity and strengthen Aave’s position on Sonic.
Rationale: Support this proposal with same reason with Snapshot vote. With ACI at the Aave DAO forefront, Aave has become the number 1 protocol by TVL.
Was also great to see how aligned you were in defending AAVE holders against the recent Horizon proposal, too.
ACI seems to have the best interests for AAVE holders so excited for the Road to 80.
RWAs are an extremely important revenue exposure for the Aave DAO, and Horizon gives us a credible path to scale it, without compromising the permissionless core of the protocol.
Moreover, the 50/50 revenue split is fair, and using GHO as a borrowing asset for institutions makes a lot of sense and helps push GHO adoption in the right direction.
I also feel good with the operational setup: giving the DAO control over the instance while letting Aave Labs manage execution and risk decisions.
Rationale: Onboarding tETH can boost Aave’s revenue potential, enhance capital efficiency, and position the protocol at the center of the growing restaking ecosystem.
Rationale: Although Soneium is still an early stage ecosystem with no native stablecoins and relies entirely on bridged assets, I see strong potential in its growth trajectory. I will support this proposal.
Deploying Aave V3 on Soneium will give Aave the opportunity to be an early mover on a new OP Stack chain backed by strong partners too.
Rationale: Voted yes with same reason on previous snapshot votes. Onboarding USDtb to Aave can boost liquidity, attracting new users, and expanding the platform’s offerings.
It also helps strengthen Aave’s reputation with high quality assets.
Rationale: USDe has quickly become one of the fastest growing stablecoins. Removing the debt ceiling will let users borrow more, drives up borrowing activity, and brings more fees and revenue back to Aave.
Adding E-Mode also can make it even more capital efficient for users.
Rationale: I’m voting yes on this. Deploying GHO on Gnosis with active, non-custodial liquidity management is a cost efficient way to deepen liquidity and expand GHO’s utility in a real world payment ecosystem like Gnosis Pay.
GHO can become a more competitive and resilient stablecoin across ecosystems.
Rationale: Continue support this proposal onchain. Adding AAVE to Base will make Aave more attractive to both existing and new users, especially for those looking to use AAVE as collateral.
The liquidity on Base will also boost flashloan activity, increasing transaction fee revenue.
b Voted in favor. Big thanks to the risk providers for making the info clear and easy to make decission.
Standardizing LST/LRT parameters across tokens like rsETH, wstETH, weETH, and cbETH helps position Aave as the go-to lending platform for advanced staking and restaking strategies.
Rationale: This campaign can help Aave grow on the Base network by bringing in more deposits and borrowers from competing platforms.
By offering specific borrowing rewards that lower users’ borrowing costs, Aave can encourage more borrowing and helps users keep their positions longer. This also creates a smart reinvestment loop: more incentives → more users → higher TVL and borrowing → more revenue → more rewards.
Rationale: I believe this proposal is a necessary step to strengthen the Risk Oracle framework
By introducing clear constraints on automation, it can ensure safety first governance while maintaining the efficiency benefits of automated cap management. Well done to Chaos Labs for the structured approach :)
