Rationale: Voted yes with same reason on Snapshot vote. This proposal can make treasury management smoother and faster while keeping things secure. Aave DAO can stay in control but move with more flexibility.
Rationale: Same reason with Snapshot vote. Adding eBTC/WBTC with E-Mode could bring in more users from other platforms with better borrowing rates. I support this proposal
Rationale: Onboarding USDtb to Aave can boost liquidity, attracting new users, and expanding the platform’s offerings. It also helps strengthen Aave’s reputation with high-quality assets.
Rationale: I think adding AAVE to Base will make the Aave more attractive to both existing and new users, especially for those looking to use AAVE as collateral.
The liquidity on Base will also boost flashloan activity, increasing transaction fee revenue.
Rationale: Voted for with same reason on Snapshot vote. Letting users borrow sDAI and adding E-mode for USDC.e/sDAI can boost lending activity and bring more users to Aave.
Also raising the Borrow Cap for sDAI can gain more fees.
Rationale: I support this proposal due to its growth potential and strategic importance for Aave.
However, liquidity risks, interest rate volatility, and the complexities of integrating the first PT token need careful monitoring before going onchain vote
Rationale: I voted yes on the ARFC with same reason on TEMCHECK. Adding stS to Aave v3 on Sonic will bring value and unlock growth opportunities for Aave DAO, helping attract liquidity and strengthen Aave’s position on Sonic.
Rationale: I support this proposal in TEMPCHECK. Onboarding tETH can boost Aave’s revenue potential, enhance capital efficiency, and position the protocol at the center of the growing restaking ecosystem.
First of all, it’s a much stronger version than the previous one, with better alignment and more upside for the DAO.
RWAs are an extremely important revenue exposure for the Aave DAO, and Horizon gives us a credible path to scale it, without compromising the permissionless core of the protocol. Moreover, the 50/50 revenue split is fair, and using GHO as a borrowing asset for institutions makes a lot of sense and helps push GHO adoption in the right direction.
I also feel good with the operational setup: giving the DAO control over the instance while letting Aave Labs manage execution and risk decisions.
This feels like the right step for Aave to stay ahead in the evolving DeFi x RWA landscape.
Rationale: Voting yes as these changes strike a good balance between risk management and capital efficiency. The new eModes introduced with Aave v3.2 are a strong upgrade to limit abuse while still allowing users to make the most of their collateral. Well-aligned with experts’s recommendations.