# Research on Aave governance

**URL:** <https://governance.aave.com/t/research-on-aave-governance/11413>\
**Category:** Other\
**Created:** [January 19, 2023, 12:49pm UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/research-on-aave-governance/11413 "2023-01-19T12:49:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nandy.eth](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/governance.aave.com/nandy.eth/32/5612_2.png) [@Nandy.eth](https://governance.aave.com/u/Nandy.eth)\
**Post date:** [January 28, 2023, 11:03pm UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/research-on-aave-governance/11413/9 "2023-01-28T23:03:42Z")

</div>

I agree with @martin in the fact that voting power must de accessible regardless of underlying blockchain for Aave gouvernance and specially for snapshot vote.

As @sakulstra said aAave and stkabpt miss their gouvernance power when stkAave does. I don’t really understand why. In addition that aAave token is back 1:1 by Aave token (Aave token is not borrowable).

Protocol security must be your first priority specially if we allow on-chain cross chain vote from L2 and sidechain to avoid double voting.

I recommend the following in importance order :

- starting with voting power implementation for aAave V2 and V3
- study the case of stkabpt needed implementation to allow voting power for their holders.
- evaluate the needs to implement Aave and aAave voting power from other chains regarding without opening game theory failure.

---

_[View the full topic](https://governance.aave.com/t/research-on-aave-governance/11413)._