# \[TEMP CHECK\] - Aave DAO's $ARB Airdrop Allocation

**URL:** <https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-aave-daos-arb-airdrop-allocation/12417>\
**Category:** Governance\
**Created:** [March 22, 2023, 4:18pm UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-aave-daos-arb-airdrop-allocation/12417 "2023-03-22T16:18:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jengajojo](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/governance.aave.com/jengajojo/32/5403_2.png) [@jengajojo](https://governance.aave.com/u/jengajojo)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2023, 8:49am UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-aave-daos-arb-airdrop-allocation/12417/8 "2023-03-27T08:49:05Z")

</div>

Thank you for the suggestion @MarcZeller

1. While it would be great for the DAO to participate in $ARB governance, practically this has been difficult for other groups since snapshots are time-limited and each vote in $ARB gov would mean spinning a separate governance process within the DAO. Additionally, we’d also need to modify existing proposal flows to accomodate these types of voting in fast track mode. A potential solution could be to form a meta-governance group within the DAO and delegate voting rights to this group. Another option is to split the voting power between these groups [ARC: Incentivized Delegate Campaign (3-month) - #5 by lajarre](https://governance.aave.com/t/arc-incentivized-delegate-campaign-3-month/11732/5)

2. I really like the idea of incentivising liquidity. If we are to delegate voting rights to a multi-sig or divide them between ‘n’ governance groups then we can execute both options [1&2] completely.

---

_[View the full topic](https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-aave-daos-arb-airdrop-allocation/12417)._