# \[TEMP CHECK\] Aave Will Win Framework **URL:** \ **Category:** General\ **Created:** [February 12, 2026, 6:53pm UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-aave-will-win-framework/24055 "2026-02-12T18:53:30Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 137
**Author:** ![MarcZeller](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/governance.aave.com/marczeller/32/7124_2.png) [@MarcZeller](https://governance.aave.com/u/MarcZeller)\ **Post date:** [March 2, 2026, 10:36am UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-aave-will-win-framework/24055/137 "2026-03-02T10:36:20Z")
# AWW Framework — Temp Check Post-Mortem The [Temp Check](https://snapshot.org/#/s:aavedao.eth/proposal/0x46d78018f1204e2337ee77edc13753869cc90163fe46a23698f67f4a98365acc) passed 622K YAE to 497K NAY. Here’s what the vote actually showed. ## The vote without Labs Remove three Labs-linked addresses from the YAE side: - Stani’s 111K cluster - Areta’s 75K (delegated entirely by Stani) - 47K wallet matching Emilio’s on-chain profile and the result flips: 387K YAE to 497K NAY. The community rejected the proposal. Labs overrode it on their own $51M budget request. ## The largest independent YAE voter agrees with us luggis.eth (123K VP) voted YAE on the general direction but conditioned his support on: - No lock-in with Labs. All IP, repositories, domains, and operational assets transferred to the DAO. - If Labs doesn’t deliver, the DAO needs to be able to move on. - 100% revenue needs guardrails, otherwise it’s too elastic. - Phased capital deployment with detailed budget breakdown. These are our [four conditions](https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-aave-will-win-framework/24055/12) restated by someone who voted the other way. The direction has support. The terms don’t. ## Restricted replies Stani [announced the result on X](https://x.com/StaniKulechov/status/2027898881594327159) with replies restricted to accounts he follows. The founder of a decentralized protocol declared victory on a contested governance vote and disabled public comment. ## ACI won’t participate in the ARFC stage We raised the issues. We published the [accountability report](https://governance.aave.com/t/aave-labs-86-million-23-of-the-token-supply-and-this-is-their-track-record/24159) and outlined [four conditions](https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-aave-will-win-framework/24055/104). None were addressed. The Temp Check passed on the back of the requester’s own votes. The dice are loaded. Continuing to negotiate inside a process where the outcome is predetermined does one thing: **it gives that process legitimacy it hasn’t earned. We won’t do that.** The data is on the record. The four conditions still stand. If Labs wants to address them, they know where to find them. We’re done asking. --- _[View the full topic](https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-aave-will-win-framework/24055)._