# \[TEMP CHECK\] Onboard USDS and sUSDS to Aave v3

**URL:** <https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-onboard-usds-and-susds-to-aave-v3/18806>\
**Category:** New Asset\
**Created:** [August 28, 2024, 1:52pm UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-onboard-usds-and-susds-to-aave-v3/18806 "2024-08-28T13:52:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![69420](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/governance.aave.com/69420/32/6920_2.png) [@69420](https://governance.aave.com/u/69420)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2024, 3:57pm UTC](https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-onboard-usds-and-susds-to-aave-v3/18806/4 "2024-09-03T15:57:44Z")

</div>

I think this is an extremely irresponsible suggestion by the ACI. Let’s think about this:

**1. The tokens haven’t even launched yet**  
2. These assets likely fail 6 of the 7 categories of the [Risk Quantification Criterion](https://docs.aave.com/risk/asset-risk/methodology)  
3. There is no oracle from Chainlink, or likely any at all at launch  
4. DAI is not a cornerstone in the Aave ecosystem - in fact Stani himself has mentioned he was in full support of [offboarding DAI from Aave completely](https://governance.aave.com/t/arfc-risk-parameters-for-dai-update/17211/9)

If incentives are all that’s needed to get a new asset onto Aave then there would be proposals for new markets every single day.

![Screenshot 2024-09-03 at 10.55.55 AM](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/uploads/aave/original/2X/e/e6af537e5c9fc05593005c1fb075f466befa3676.png)

---

_[View the full topic](https://governance.aave.com/t/temp-check-onboard-usds-and-susds-to-aave-v3/18806)._