Hello,
is this considered a whitelable instance like Horizon and WLFI or this is an Aave market maintained by the DAO but only tailored to fit Ether.fi business model?
What is being covered by whom?
I would like to point to this proposal from me [ARFC] Strategic Opportunity Framework for Friendly Forks and Whitelabel Instances
Because I do think we are in a situation where we do need a framework that is not only clear on revenue sharing but also on responsibilites for a new market, depending on what it is going to be exactly.
I assume that other SP probably have similiar questions as like I said, depending on what this exactly is going to be, they need to support it or now. Which will take ressources from these teams, slowing down other relevant tasks within the DAO.
My point is that we need to define clear rules on how to proceed with proposals like this in order to let everyone know what this means for their daily business and where and how the DAO benefits from this, or if its even beneficial.
In terms or numbers, can ACI or someone from Ether.fi give the DAO numbers on what they expect the potential revenue could be? This is important as this is the most important number for us, if the market in the end would be at a net loss for the DAO, because of operational work from SP then I would vote against the market. We already have several markets that are at loss for the DAO but need to be maintained in terms of risk, security and simply management.