We provided multiple options in order to be comprehensive and collaborative, because in the past we received pushback for not adding enough options. But, we understand the need to simplify the discussion.
One important topic above is whether the protocol should add E-mode specific caps:
What this means is that, for example, Asset X may have a Supply Cap of 10,000 in non-emode, and a separate Supply Cap of 6,000 in E-mode (for example, ETH correlated E-mode). The reason for this is that the risk profile of Asset X in non-E-mode is different than that of its risk profile in E-mode (the LTs are different, the asset correlations are different, etc), so by separating caps between E-mode and non-E-mode, we are able to more granularly tune risk parameters, with more precision to capital efficiency.
We have published the vote below, with only 2 options. Voting begins next week - we appreciate the community’s participation.