Dear all,
Thank you for the proposal. I think it makes sense to review and improve governance processes every now and then. Simple question from me:
Who can propose ARFCs for governance topics in the future?
I read that in some cases (e.g., new listing) this must be done by official service providers. I hope this is not the case for all AFRCs.
Reason: I am an investor and looking forward to hearing more about how Aave token economics will effectively be kept strong or strengthened - especially vis-a-vis service providers who might also have more hidden incentives such as their own stock or revenues allocations.
Potential future governance topics could include investment decisions, buybacks, provider selection criterias, service provider reviews, etc..
Knowing that all topics can be brought forward and will be addressed on governance discussions would give me comfort/trust and be in the interests of Aave token holders.
Thanks for your thoughts and comments.
Warm regards, Millesimillia