With the ACI, we would like to voice our disapproval of @Llamaxyz doing a bundle on AIP-220 integrating an AGD-related component in this AIP. This second component of the AIP has zero links or coherence with the main component of this AIP.
While we’re supportive of both components of this AIPs, we think it sets dangerous precedence in the DAO. We are building not only for now but for the future. Bending the rules now will lead to the far west later.
The voice of the token holders should be respected, and “bundling” is not allowing vote granularity of their decisions.
However, as the “second” component of this AIPs is simply an operational adjustment of a previously approved governance decision, we will not cast a NAY vote on this AIP. We will instead intentionally not cast a vote.
We want to publicly state, that any other bundle in the future will be met by a NAY vote from the ACI and encourage service providers to refrain from publishing them.
