Hey @bgdlabs team, very interesting post ! Looking forward to read the Cross-chain one as well.
I’m not following Aave Governance enough to know this, but I’m wondering if there really is a pain or need to decrease voting cost to the point of doing this whole revamp of the Governance process. Interesting design either way !
On the security side, you could try to go through a Code4Arena contest, it looks much better than traditional auditing.
Multiple Voting Networks
Though I understand your will to propose a global opt-in approach, my 2 cents is that having votes taking place on potentially different networks could quickly become hard to follow for the community, and adds unnecessary complexity on the dev side.
However, having the possibility to switch to another network if needed is great as it adds resiliency !
Future proof and new voting assets
The modular aspect of the design is great. Are there any specific requirements for an ERC20 token to be used as voting asset ?
On another note, do you have a rough ballpark on the timeline? Is it looking more like 2 to 3 months or 8 to 10?