I find this proposal to be a net negative for the Aave ecosystem, as it aims to shift the blame and responsibility for Harmony’s self-collapse.
The only mistake made by the Aave DAO was allowing Harmony to claim it would deploy incentives for Aave users. In reality, Harmony mainly supported only ONE deposit and largely self-rewarded itself and frens by becoming large circular LPs, creating zero actual economic activity and exposing Aave users to harm when the bridge was hacked.
The ACI will never vote for any recovery effort. We do not hold the Aave DAO responsible for this situation, except for having built a castle upon unsound foundations.