@setaavefree Not super active in governance, was my first reply on here actually, I assume a lot of people like me are opinionated but no time to argue online about it unfortunately.
Think these points are catching on or are we alone here?
Nobody seems to like the “let a protocol be a protocol” idea. Instead they want anyone building on the protocol to give 100% of their revenue to the DAO and beg for lunch money after producing endless reports and disclosures. Antithesis of smart contract composability.
2 Likes
what you guys are saying makes sense to me