Thanks for putting these forward @Gauntlet
There seems to be a discrepancy between the table and the analysis .
Could you please clarify which is the intended configuration? In our recommendations above, we leaned towards conservatism and added an additional buffer for the LT setting given the limited historical data available for ARB as a new token. We recommend moving forward with the 60% LT setting.
To simplify the governance process, we suggest converging on a single set of recommendations, choosing the more conservative parameters of the two recommendations.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Isolation Mode | Yes |
| Borrowable | Yes |
| Collateral Enabled | Yes |
| Supply Cap (ARB) | 20M |
| Borrow Cap (ARB) | 16.5M |
| Debt Ceiling | $14M |
| LTV | 50.00% |
| LT | 60.00% |
| Liquidation Bonus | 10.00% |
| Liquidation Protocol Fee | 10.00% |
| Reserve Factor | 20.00% |
| Variable Base | 0.00% |
| Variable Slope1 | 7.00% |
| Variable Slope2 | 300.00% |
| Uoptimal | 45% |
| Stable Borrowing | Disabled |