The Uncomfortable Question: Does the DAO have a "Plan B" (Contingency Strategy)?

Recent governance events have clarified one thing: The Community and Aave Labs have significantly different visions regarding autonomy and asset ownership. While the “NO” vote was a strong signal, the subsequent silence creates a dangerous uncertainty.

As we wait for Aave Labs to propose a new structure, we must address the “Elephant in the Room.” Hope is not a strategy, and waiting is not a plan.

The “Two-Headed” Risk

Aave is currently operating under a dual-power dynamic (DAO vs. Labs) that naturally creates friction. If this misalignment persists, or if the upcoming proposal from Labs is another “take it or leave it” offer, we risk entering a permanent gridlock that stalls innovation while competitors move fast.

I am asking the Delegates and Service Providers (ACI, BGD, Chaos, etc.) the following critical questions regarding our Risk Management:

1. The “Walk Away” Scenario

If Aave Labs refuses to cede the IP/Brand to a neutral Foundation or demands terms the DAO cannot accept:

Do we have a contingency plan to operate completely independently?

Is the DAO prepared to migrate to a new brand/platform identity if the current one is held hostage?

2. Operational Continuity

If the partnership with Labs dissolves:

Are our current Service Providers (BGD, ACI, etc.) capable of taking over the full development and frontend maintenance immediately?

Is there a “Shadow Frontend” or alternative access point ready to be deployed if aave.com becomes restricted or divergent from DAO interests?

3. The Alternative Path

Does the DAO have a roadmap for a “Plan B” where we rebuild the interface and user acquisition channels from scratch, without reliance on the current entity holding the IP?

Why I am asking this:

This is not to spread FUD, but to ensure Anti-Fragility.

A DAO that relies 100% on a single vendor’s good will is not decentralized; it is captured. Knowing that we have a Plan B is actually the best way to ensure we never have to use it, as it strengthens our negotiation position.

We need transparency not just on what we hope happens, but on what we will do if the worst happens.

2 Likes