I understand that such a partnership would being growth opportunities to Aave.
However, I heard rumors (from X accounts such as Bitfinexed) stating that USDT, which is also issued by Tether, might not be fully backed by reserves, and that Tether was known for practicing “creative accounting”.
Due to Tether being unregulated, I don’t think we have enough data to prove or disprove such rumors, which I think brings a lot of uncertainity.
Thus, since you’re listing XAUt, it makes me wonder how you would address such rumors.
Finally, the “Do the job we’re paid for first, then point out the results after” doctrine leaves me very skeptical, since it seems to remove voter oversight from the equation.
Hence, I have the following questions
- How to you respond to the allegations against Tether?
- Is Aave still voter-governed, or are voters more like “yes men” supposed to give legitimacy to decisions taken secretly?
- Shall the rumors against Tether be true, who would be held responsible for the chaos ensuing a XAUt depeg?
Disclaimer : while this post acknowledges the presence of rumors against Tether, it doesn’t claim these rumors to be true nor attempts to attack Tether’s reputation.