Supportive of more synergies and symbiotic relationships!
However
Considering the time sensitive nature of the transaction, this proposal can proceed in a direct-to-AIP vote that will allow for the following:
Why is it time sensitive? I’m a stickler for details and I don’t think this aligns to the specifications of ‘direct to AIP’ process (i.e. it is using treasury funds + adding new flash borrowers, not setting protocol params). Therefore it shouldn’t be a ‘direct to AIP’.
I have nothing against the spirit of the ARFC, my concern is that governance processes should be strictly followed unless in exceptional circumstances (e.g. security reasons), since the community has certain expectations of governance process. If certain steps are skipped or previously agreed processes are not followed then it may undermine the trust in the governance process/framework. In a broader context, not having a tightly followed governance process can open up the governance attack surface.