[Direct to AIP] Onboard sUSDe and USDe to Aave V3 Avalanche Instance

[Direct to AIP] Onboard sUSDe and USDe to Aave V3 Avalanche Instance

Author: ACI

Date: 2025-09-06

Proposal has been updated with latest Risk Parameters by Risk Service Providers 2025-09-23


Summary

This proposal seeks to onboard sUSDe and USDe to the Aave v3 protocol on Avalanche.

Motivation

The onboarding of sUSDe and USDe to the Aave Avalanche Instance will provide users with high quality yield bearing stablecoin collateral to help expand stablecoin usage on this instance.

As the Avalanche instance shows promise and potential for significant growth we believe the time is right for expanding collateral options on this network with a focus on those assets which have proven to be in demand on other Aave instances.

Ava Labs has committed 1000 AVAX per week in incentives to bootstrapping usage of these assets on the Avalanche Aave instance.

Specification

Specification

Proposal has been updated with latest Risk Parameters by Risk Service Providers 2025-09-23

USDe & sUSDe Market Configuration (Avalanche Instance)

Parameter Value Value
Asset USDe sUSDe
Isolation Mode No No
Borrowable Yes No
Collateral Enabled Yes Yes
Supply Cap 50,000,000 50,000,000
Borrow Cap 42,500,000 -
Debt Ceiling - -
LTV 70% 70%
LT 73% 73%
Liquidation Bonus 8.5% 8.5%
Liquidation Protocol Fee 10.00% 10.00%
Variable Base 0 -
Variable Slope1 6.5% -
Variable Slope2 50% -
Uoptimal 80% -
Reserve Factor 25% -
Stable Borrowing Disabled Disabled
Flashloanable No No
Borrowable in Isolation No No
E-Mode Category Stablecoin Stablecoin

USDe Stablecoin E-mode Configuration

Parameter Value Value Value Value
Asset USDe USDt GHO USDC
Collateral Yes No No No
Borrowable No Yes Yes Yes
Max LTV 89% - - -
Liquidation Threshold 92% - - -
Liquidation Bonus 2% - - -

sUSDe Stablecoin E-mode Configuration

Parameter Value Value Value Value Value
Asset sUSDe USDe USDt GHO USDC
Collateral Yes No No No No
Borrowable No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Max LTV 89% 89% - - -
Liquidation Threshold 91% 91% - - -
Liquidation Bonus 4% 4% - - -

CAPO Parameters sUSDe

Token Snapshot Delay maxYearlyGrowthRatio
sUSDe 14 days 15.19%

Disclaimer

This proposal is powered by Skywards. ACI is not directly affiliated with Ethena and did not receive compensation for creation this proposal. ACI and its members may hold Ethena ecosystem tokens.

Next Steps

  1. Publication of a standard ARFC, collect community & service provider feedback before escalating proposal to ARFC snapshot stage.
  2. If the ARFC snapshot outcome is YAE, publish an AIP vote for final confirmation and enforcement of the proposal.

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived under CC0

2 Likes

Summary

LlamaRisks supports the onboarding of sUSDe and USDe to the Avalanche instance, conditional on introducing a sUSDe/USDe price feed. Both assets are well known to Aave and have proven popular on the Core market with USDe and sUSDe representing $1.54B and $1.16B supplied, respectively. While liquidity is relatively low at ~2.4M USDe and ~3M sUSDe, incentives committed by Ava Labs (1000 AVAX per week) are likely to boost liquidity inflows soon after the assets deployment.

Given the recent bridge to Avalanche, the price history for both assets is limited. Liquidity venues at the time of writing are limited, with USDe having only 1 pool and sUSDe availability concentrated in 2 pools. Both contracts inherit LayerZero’s OFT standard, a standard utilized by other Aave-listed assets such as USDT0.

Both sUSDe and USDe are owned by a 5/10 multisig; sensitive functions such as ownership transfer and the ability to delegate admin functions that can affect transfer rates between chains represent the main access control risk considerations.

1. Asset Fundamental Characteristics

1.1 Asset

USDe is a dollar-pegged stablecoin, backed by delta-neutral positions and liquid stablecoins. sUSDe is the yield-accruing asset of staking USDe. Extensive analyses of USDe and sUSDe have been conducted in the past, with previous reports detailing their underlying design and risk considerations, including: Asset Risk Assessment of Ethena’s USDe/sUSDe, Onboarding USDe on Ethereum, and Onboarding sUSDe on Ethereum.

1.2 Architecture

sUSDe and USDe on Avalanche are bridged through LayerZero infrastructure and utilize the Omnichain Fungible Token (OFT) standard. Since OFTs are already present on Aave markets, introducing the bridging mechanism or the underlying asset poses little additional architectural risk, given their prior presence.

#1.3 Tokenomics

The OFT standard debits from the source chain and credits on the destination chain whenever an asset is bridged, maintaining canonical supply.

1.3.1 Token Holder Concentration

Source: sUSDe token holders, Snowtrace, September 9th, 2025

A total of 2.4M sUSDe is currently available on Avalanche; 2 accounts hold 99% of sUSDe’s supply, namely a Uniswap sUSDe/USDT pool and an LFJ sUSDe/USDC pair (formerly TraderJoe).

Source: USDe token holders, Snowtrace, September 9th, 2025

3M USDe has been bridged to date, with 99% held in a Uniswap USDe/USDT pool.

2. Market Risk

2.1 Liquidity

Source: sUSDe to USDT swap, Odos, September 10th, 2025

Swap Approximately 5.6M sUSDe worth $6.6M can be swapped for USDT within a 7.5% price impact (~$6.2M).

Source: USDe to USDT swap, Odos, September 10th, 2025

Approximately 2.15M sUSDe can be swapped for USDT within a 7.5% price impact.

2.1.1 Liquidity Venue Concentration

Source: sUSDe Pool Pairs, GeckoTerminal, September 10th, 2025

Notable sUSDe liquidity on Avalanche is distributed across 3 DEX venues, Uniswap (~$5M TVL in a sUSDe/USDT pool), LFJ (~$3.3M TVL in a sUSDe/USDC pool), and Pharoah (~$520K TVL across 3 pools).

Source: USDe Pool Pair, GeckoTerminal, September 10th, 2025

USDe liquidity is limited to a single USDe/USDT Uniswap pool, as shown by token holder distribution. This pool is relatively new, having been created on August 28th.

Liquidity is more pronounced for sUSDe relative to USDe, as shown by the swap price impact and liquidity venue options.

2.1.2 DEX LP Concentration

sUSDe LP providers in the most significant DEX pools are distributed as follows:

  • Uniswap sUSDe/USDT pool is currently limited to 1 EOA

  • LFJ sUSDe/USDC pool is currently supplied by 7 LPs with a single EOA, supplying over 60% of the pool’s TVL

Visibility for LPs for the sole USDe/USDT pool is low; however, given its recent creation, a limited number of suppliers may be present. While low LP distribution would be of concern in most instances, given both assets’ recent bridging to Avalanche, one should expect the distribution of LPs to widen as the assets grow over time.

2.2 Volatility

Source: sUSDe Price Chart Dexsceener, September 10th, 2025

sUSDe price history on Avalanche is limited; however, it has shown incremental growth in line with its yield-bearing characteristics, with no significant negative price deviation.

Source: USDe Price Chart, GeckoTerminal, September 10th, 2025

At the time of writing, the USDe price history is limited, with the price chart based on the recently deployed Uniswap pool.

2.3 Exchanges

USDe is listed on multiple exchanges, including Binance, Bybit, MEXC, Bitunix, and Kucoin, among others.

sUSDe is not listed on exchanges.

3. Technological Risk

3.1 Smart Contract Risk

An audit was performed on the Ethena OFT code on January 16th, 2025, by Zellic. This audit on the Layerzero codebase specific to Ethena found no issues of any level.

3.2 Bug Bounty

Layerzero and Ethena both have bug bounties, with max bounties worth $15.5M and $3M, respectively. OFT, USDe, and StakedUSDe smart contracts are explicitly stated in the program’s scopes.

4. Counterparty Risk

4.1 Access Control Risk

OFTs inherit the OpenZeppelin Ownable Standard, with sUSDe and USDe implementing a 2-step ownership process through OFTOwnable2Step. The owner of the contract has admin rights (transfer or renounce ownership) and the ability to set the address of the rateLimiter contract, which enables the owner or the rate limiter contract to modify the rate limits for transfers between chains.

Loss of ownership or a malicious rate limiter address being set would relinquish control of sUSDe and USDe contracts, risking interruption or halts of transfers back to the canonical chain or onto Avalanche.

4.2.1 Timelock Duration and Function

No timelock is present in either contract.

4.2.2 Multisig Threshold / Signer identity

sUSDe and USDe are owned by a 5/10 Safe Multisig.

Note: This assessment follows the LLR-Aave Framework, a comprehensive methodology for asset onboarding and parameterization in Aave V3. This framework is continuously updated and [u]available here[/u].

[/details]

Aave V3 Specific Parameters

Will be presented jointly with @ChaosLabs

Price feed Recommendation

We recommend the utilization of a sUSDe/USDe exchange rate feed, with underlying USDe priced using the Chainink USDT/USD feed, as used by other USDe-denominated assets within the Aave ecosystem.

Disclaimer

This review was independently prepared by LlamaRisk, a DeFi risk service provider funded in part by the Aave DAO. LlamaRisk is not directly affiliated with the protocol(s) reviewed in this assessment and did not receive any compensation from the protocol(s) or their affiliated entities for this work.

The information provided should not be construed as legal, financial, tax, or professional advice.

1 Like

Overview

Chaos Labs supports the listing of USDe & sUSDe on the Aave V3 Avalanche instance. Both assets have a proven track record on Ethereum, demonstrating strong user demand. Below, we present our analysis of USDe and sUSDe along with initial risk parameter recommendations.

Cross Chain Infrastructure

USDe and sUSDe bridge between Ethereum and Avalanche via LayerZero using two contracts: an adapter on Ethereum that escrows the canonical tokens and an OFT on Avalanche that mints and burns. For Ethereum to Avalanche, users approve the adapter and call send; the adapter locks the tokens, emits a LayerZero message, and the Avalanche OFT mints the same amount to the recipient’s address. By default, there are no bridge haircuts, as the amount sent equals the amount received after dust rounding. Neither USDe nor sUSDe can be minted natively on Avalanche, since their Avalanche contracts mint only when a LayerZero message confirms tokens have been locked on Ethereum, making them purely bridged representations.

Because sUSDe on Avalanche is a bridged representation and does not run vault logic, its exchange rate is not carried across by the bridge itself. Instead, the rate is enforced through arbitrage to the Ethereum DEX counterparts.

Market Cap & Liquidity

USDe and sUSDe were both launched on Avalanche in early August 2025 and experienced sharp increases in supply toward the end of the month. For USDe, the surge was driven by a single bridge of 2.5M on August 28. For sUSDe, supply growth was driven by three bridge transactions: two totaling approximately 840K on August 21 and another bridge of 2.1M on August 28. All these transactions were initiated by the same address. After bridging the funds, the user immediately deposited the tokens into the USDe/USDt and sUSDe/USDt Uniswap liquidity pools.

Currently, all USDe liquidity is concentrated in the USDe/USDt Uniswap Liquidity Pool, which has maintained a stable TVL of $5M since its launch on August 28.

For sUSDe, its liquidity is primarily concentrated in the sUSDe/USDt Uniswap Liquidity Pool with a TVL of $5M, the sUSDe/USDC LFJ Liquidity Pool with a TVL of $3.58M, the sUSDe/USDC Pharaoh Liquidity Pool with a TVL of $452.19K, the sUSDe/USDt Pharaoh Liquidity Pool with a TVL of $414.52K. Below, we present aggregated sUSDe liquidity over the past 20 days, which has trended steadily upward.

Volatility

To further evaluate whether the USDe and sUSDe liquidity pools on Avalanche are effective, which means assessing their ability to support stable trading by keeping prices closely aligned with benchmarks, we fetched the effective prices of both assets in their respective Avalanche pools and compared them against their effective prices in the Ethereum liquidity pools, which serve as benchmarks given that Ethereum DEX pools have the largest volume or scale.

USDe

We compare the effective trading price of USDe in the USDe/USDt Uniswap liquidity pool on Avalanche with that in the USDe/USDT pool on Ethereum. As shown in the figure below, the effective price of USDe in the Avalanche pool has remained stably pegged to $1 and, for most of the time, closely tracked the effective price observed in the Ethereum pool. However, we also believe this outcome is partly the result of the relatively short operating history of the USDe/USDt pool on Avalanche and the limited number of observed transactions, which reduces the likelihood of price dislocations.

Although historical data is limited, the available evidence shows that USDe has maintained strong peg stability in the liquidity pool on Avalanche. Accordingly, we assess that the risk of market inefficiency is limited. Chaos Labs will continue to monitor the USDe Avalanche liquidity pool to ensure it remains effective over time.

sUSDe

Next, we present the effective price of sUSDe in the sUSDe/USDt Uniswap Liquidity Pool on Avalanche alongside that in the sUSDe/USDT Uniswap Liquidity Pool on Ethereum. As shown in the chart, the effective price of sUSDe in the Avalanche pool has maintained a stable peg with its effective price in the Ethereum pool over the past two weeks, with the largest dislocation limited to 5 bps. This indicates that the sUSDe/USDt Uniswap pool on Avalanche is functioning efficiently, as arbitrage activity has been sufficient to eliminate small gaps and maintain the peg.

At the same time, we observe a pattern similar to that of the USDe market. Due to its similarly limited operating history, trading volume in the Avalanche pool remains relatively low at end of August. However, more granular data indicates that activity is gradually increasing, suggesting that market depth and trading capacity are steadily improving.

E-Mode

We recommend establishing a sUSDe Stablecoin E-Mode and a USDe Stablecoin E-Mode to facilitate looping behavior and enhance capital efficiency, with the goal of driving growth in the sUSDe & USDe market.

LTV, Liquidation Threshold, and Liquidation Bonus

From the perspective of market efficiency and relative liquidity, setting the same parameters for USDe and sUSDe as on Ethereum Mainnet would be reasonable. However, in order to account for possible price deviation between the asset’s value and the Avalanche DEX prices, given that both assets have only been onboarded on Avalanche for about a month and their liquidity data has yet to establish a solid track record, we recommend applying slightly more conservative risk parameters than those on Ethereum. Based on this, we suggest setting sUSDe and USDe at an LTV of 70%, an LT of 73%, and an LB of 8.5%.

Supply Cap and Borrow Cap

Given the scale and growth of USDe and sUSDe’s on-chain liquidity, along with the seamless cross-chain bridging enabled by LayerZero OFT, we believe a relatively high supply cap is justified. We therefore recommend setting the initial supply cap for both assets at 50M.

We also recommend setting the borrow cap of USDe in line with the Uoptimal threshold, slightly above to accommodate additional borrowing demand, specifically at 42.5M.

Interest Rate

We recommend aligning USDe’s interest rate parameters with those of other stablecoins on Avalanche. At the same time, we suggest setting a lower Uoptimal at 80% to account for USDe’s recent launch on Avalanche and its relatively limited supply.

Oracle/Pricing

We recommend pricing sUSDe using the sUSDe/USDe exchange rate oracle, combined with the CAPO adapter and further calibrated by the Risk Oracle, while using the USDT/USD Chainlink oracle to price USDe.

CAPO

sUSDe’s yield has shown a moderate level of volatility. Taking this into account, we recommend setting the Snapshot Delay at 14 days and the maxYearlyGrowthRatio at 15.19%.

Specification

USDe & sUSDe Market Configuration (Avalanche Instance)

Parameter Value Value
Asset USDe sUSDe
Isolation Mode No No
Borrowable Yes No
Collateral Enabled Yes Yes
Supply Cap 50,000,000 50,000,000
Borrow Cap 42,500,000 -
Debt Ceiling - -
LTV 70% 70%
LT 73% 73%
Liquidation Bonus 8.5% 8.5%
Liquidation Protocol Fee 10.00% 10.00%
Variable Base 0 -
Variable Slope1 6.5% -
Variable Slope2 50% -
Uoptimal 80% -
Reserve Factor 25% -
Stable Borrowing Disabled Disabled
Flashloanable No No
Borrowable in Isolation No No
E-Mode Category Stablecoin Stablecoin

USDe Stablecoin E-mode Configuration

Parameter Value Value Value Value
Asset USDe USDt GHO USDC
Collateral Yes No No No
Borrowable No Yes Yes Yes
Max LTV 89% - - -
Liquidation Threshold 92% - - -
Liquidation Bonus 2% - - -

sUSDe Stablecoin E-mode Configuration

Parameter Value Value Value Value Value
Asset sUSDe USDe USDt GHO USDC
Collateral Yes No No No No
Borrowable No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Max LTV 89% 89% - - -
Liquidation Threshold 91% 91% - - -
Liquidation Bonus 4% 4% - - -

CAPO Parameters sUSDe

Token Snapshot Delay maxYearlyGrowthRatio
sUSDe 14 days 15.19%

Disclaimer

Chaos Labs has not been compensated by any third party for publishing this research. Our pre-launch risk reports on Ethena, published over a year ago, represented a temporary compensated engagement, bear no implications on the current state of the protocol and can be viewed here on our website. We additionally provide proof-of-reserve attestations for the Ethena Protocol, which periodically reflect the aggregate state of the portfolio relative to the underlying USDe shares emitted.

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0

1 Like