Thanks Alex, how do I initiate a risk analysis review on adding UMA?
Well this is to be done as part of the application so either by you or you could reach out to analyst who have done it for other projects on the forum
Is there a particular forum you have in mind where you know of an analyst who has done this or do you have some contacts in mind?
Can you provide an example of the risk analysis? I don’t see a template in the “Aave Risk Framework methodology” link you provided.
I found this here on the gov forum: Listing Proposal: Add xSUSHI - #16 by Alex_BertoG
It was just a basic search I did, but you could find others who have done it, as per the methodology in the second link above from Alex, in other listing proposals.
You can check in the forum the analysts who have shared risk assessments. In most cases the proposer managed to implement the risk methodology to quantify the risks themselves.
Thank you @Wraithers!!
Is there anything the SuperUMAns can do to aid in the assessment? Do let us know. Excited to see this move ahead!
@Alex_BertoG the risk assessment has been added! Let me know if you need anything else and what the next steps are.
Shoutout to our community member Graud for completing the risk assessment!
@Alex_BertoG can you advise on next steps for this proposal?
As described in the asset listing guide next step would be the parameter suggestion and snapshot to gather community sentiment. Gauntlet is continuously optimising the risk parameters so I’d suggest starting conservative and letting them refine them
@Alex_BertoG the asset listing guide says I need 1 AAVE to propose a vote on snapshot but snapshot is saying 50 AAVE. Would be good to update the guide.
Thanks for flagging it and apologies, the threshold was increased last month to avoid spam snapshots. I’ve corrected the docs now
Snapshot vote is live for the next 7 days! I appreciate everyone’s help and support! <3
@Alex_BertoG for the snapshot vote do we just need more yes’s than no’s? Or are there other mechanics to the snapshot being considered ‘Approved’?
thats right its just to gauge community sentiment. It can also be used to understand the community’s favorite outcome among multiple parameter calibration for example
@Alex_BertoG now that we have community sentiment, I’m going to create the AIP. How much proposition power do I need? If I want to have proposition power delegated to me what’s the best way to go about that?
FYI the links in steps 4 and 5 in the new asset listing guide are broken.
Thanks links were updated due to V3 doc update, changing in the gov docs Governance Guide - Developers
Update: I’ve submitted a PR into the Pending-AIP branch
@Alex_BertoG is there a timeline on when we can expect this PR to be merged? Can you push the team to review / provide comments if needed?
@Alex_BertoG any update on next steps here?