Phenk53.eth Delegate Platform

Key Info

Introduction

Hey everyone! I’ve been in crypto for over 8 years now, with a Master’s degree in Blockchain & Distributed Ledger Technologies and more than 5 years of full-time experience as a crypto analyst. Over that time, I’ve developed a deep understanding of DeFi and especially Aave, which I see as the most secure and battle-tested lending protocol in the space.

I’m not a company, a service provider, or backed by any institution – just an individual like you who cares about the long-term success of Aave and its DAO.

Why You Should Delegate to Me

I believe that active governance is key to Aave’s future growth and decentralization. Many token holders don’t have the time or resources to review every proposal, and that’s where I come in. If you delegate to me, I’ll make sure your voice is heard and that governance decisions are made in the best interest of the Aave community.

What sets me apart is my mix of analytical expertise and my hands-on approach in this ecosystem: I break down complex proposals, evaluate their impact, and vote in a way that aligns with the values of decentralization, security, and sustainable growth.

What Voters Can Expect from Me

Here’s what I commit to:

  • I’ll vote in the best interest of the Aave DAO and its token holders.
  • I’ll support decentralization and the long-term sustainability of Aave.
  • I’ll analyze proposals deeply and share my rationale in a clear, transparent way.
  • I’ll stay independent – no hidden agenda, no external funding (bribing), just honest governance.

Some Closing Thoughts

I strongly believe that Aave’s strength lies in its community. Whether you hold 1 AAVE or 1.000, your voice matters. By delegating to me, you’re not just choosing someone to vote for you – you’re helping to build a more engaged and resilient DAO.

Let’s make Aave governance simpler, more transparent, and more effective – together.

Cheers!

3 Likes

Most people following the forum don’t know @phenk53 yet, but I’m sure they will. I was able to convince him to become a delegate and engage with proposals and vote on TEMP CHECKS and ARFC as well as AIPs from now on.
I think he will be a great addition to the DAO, further decentralizing it.
I met him when I moved to Malta and he was already able to meet a lot SP and delegates at ETHCC just recently.
If you are an Aave holder, consider delegating to him as well. This will help the DAO to get again another view on proposals and further decentralize the DAO.
It’s great seeing another delegate platform joining Aave and hopefully more are to come.
Wishing you a good start!

2 Likes

Thank you @EzR3aL :)

I’m excited to actively contribute to the DAO and bring another perspective to governance. Looking forward to collaborating with all of you, engaging in constructive discussions, and helping to further decentralize Aave.

You have my delegation as diversity of delegate is important. I look forward to seeing how you use it to drive value to us Aave holders.

MrKris

2 Likes

As a new delegate, I am committed to being transparent with my voting record and rationale. Below is a summary of my recent votes.

Date Voted: September 03, 2025

7. Proposal: Onboard sUSDe November expiry PT tokens on Aave V3 Core Instance (AIP Onchain)

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this AIP as the previous sUSDe PT onboarding proved successful in attracting inflows and deepening Aave’s market. Extending support to the November expiry ensures continuity, facilitates rollover demand, and helps maintain Aave as a key venue for PT liquidity.

Date Voted: September 03, 2025

8. Proposal: Multi eMode Update and Creation - rsETH, ezETH, wstETH and weETH (AIP Onchain)

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR as this update brings consistent eMode parameters for LRTs on Arbitrum and Core, aligns risk with wstETH, and supports the upcoming DRIPs campaign while meeting user demand for ETH borrowing.

Date Voted: September 04, 2025

9. Proposal: [ARFC] Aave v2 deprecation (tech) - next phase

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal because it’s a smart and necessary step in winding down Aave v2. The updates don’t disrupt users but make the system healthier by allowing full liquidations, cleaning up old bad debt with ClinicStewardV2, and aligning v2 more closely with v3. With a lot of liquidity still in v2, it’s important to phase it out responsibly—and this proposal does just that.

Date Voted: September 04, 2025

10. Proposal: [ARFC] Add Fluid Protocol to flashBorrowers

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR as Fluid Protocol has been a reliable and long-standing partner in the Aave ecosystem. Extending flashBorrower access to their deployments on Polygon and Avalanche strengthens integrations, supports GHO growth, and provides more flexibility for users without adding systemic risk.

Date Voted: September 04, 2025

11. Proposal: [ARFC] Aave v2 Deprecation - Update

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal as it further supports the orderly wind-down of Aave v2 across Ethereum, Polygon, and Avalanche. By adjusting key parameters—raising base borrow rates, lowering Uoptimal, and increasing the reserve factor—it creates stronger incentives for users to migrate to v3, while preventing extreme borrowing costs. These changes align incentives, discourage idle capital in v2, and help safeguard the long-term health of the Aave ecosystem.

Date Voted: September 05, 2025

12. Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] Onboard USDG to Aave V3 Core Instance

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR as USDG brings a fully regulated, fiat-backed stablecoin to Aave V3. Backed 1:1 by cash and Treasuries, MiCA-compliant, and supported by Paxos with a Chainlink oracle, it adds both trust and diversity to Aave’s stablecoin markets.

3 Likes

Date Voted: September 08, 2025

13. Proposal: [ARFC] Deploy Aave v3 on Plasma

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR as deploying Aave v3 on Plasma expands Aave to a high-performance, stablecoin-focused chain. With strong incentives, liquidity commitments, and GHO integration, this move brings new users and capital while diversifying Aave’s ecosystem.

Date Voted: September 10, 2025

14. Proposal: Add Fluid Protocol to flashBorrowers

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal. I don’t have a strong view on it, but whitelisting Fluid Protocol for flashBorrowers on Polygon and Avalanche seems reasonable, given their long-standing role in the ecosystem and contribution to GHO growth.

Date Voted: September 12, 2025

15. Proposal: GHO Facilitator Replacement

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal. I don’t have a strong opinion on it, but fixing the CoreGhoDirectMinter setup seems like a sensible step to restore upgradeability and keep governance processes clean.

Date Voted: September 12, 2025

16. Proposal: September Funding Update

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this funding update as it ensures the DAO’s operations, buybacks, and incentive programs remain properly funded while consolidating assets across networks.

Date Voted: September 15, 2025

17. Proposal: Risk Parameter Adjustments for Aave V3 Scroll Instance

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: No strong opinion on this proposal, but I voted FOR as it aligns with the overall direction of the DAO

Date Voted: September 15, 2025

18. Proposal: Add EURC to Avalanche V3 Instance

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal as onboarding EURC on Avalanche V3 strengthens Aave’s position in Europe with a trusted, fully backed Euro stablecoin from Circle. Adding EURC diversifies stablecoin offerings, enhances liquidity, and opens Aave to a broader user base seeking Euro-denominated markets. This is a strategic step to expand adoption and utility across DeFi.

Date Voted: September 15, 2025

19. Proposal: Raise sUSDe and USDe November expiry PT tokens caps on Aave V3 Core Instance

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal as raising the caps for sUSDe and USDe November PT tokens ensures a smooth rollover and accommodates strong user demand. Allowing higher deposits prevents capital from leaving Aave for alternatives and helps sustain inflows that have already proven beneficial to the protocol.

Date Voted: September 15, 2025

20. Proposal: Plasma aDI path activation

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal as registering the Plasma a.DI adapters is a necessary technical step to enable the upcoming Aave v3 Plasma deployment. This ensures secure cross-chain messaging and mirrors the setup already used on other networks like Sonic and Celo.

Date Voted: September 15, 2025

21. Proposal: [ARFC] Steward Deployment: MainnetSwapSteward and RewardsSteward

  • Vote: For
  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal because the new MainnetSwapSteward and RewardsSteward make Aave’s treasury management easier and safer. They reduce governance overhead, allow the DAO to handle swaps and rewards more efficiently, and keep funds under DAO control.

Date Voted: September 19, 2025

22. Proposal: [ARFC] Safety Module & Umbrella Emission Update

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal because it makes Aave’s incentive programs more efficient and sustainable. Overall, these changes save costs, reduce risks, and improve long-term stability for the protocol.

Date Voted: September 19, 2025

23. Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] Deploy Aave v3 on X Layer

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal as deploying Aave v3 on X Layer is a strategic chance to expand into a payment-focused blockchain from day one as the core liquidity layer.

Date Voted: September 22, 2025

24. Proposal: Aave V2 deprecation

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal as it is a responsible next step in winding down Aave v2. With significant liquidity still in v2, this careful deprecation is the right path forward.

Date Voted: September 22, 2025

25. Proposal: Aave V3.5 Plasma Activation

  • Vote: For

Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal as activating Aave V3 on Plasma is a major step to expand into a high-performance, stablecoin-focused network. Plasma offers zero fees, fast execution, and stablecoin adoption, giving Aave a strategic first-mover advantage and new growth opportunities. This deployment comes also with strong technical and risk checks.

2 Likes

Date Voted: September 24, 2025

26. Proposal: [ARFC] Aave Liquidity Committee Funding Phase VII

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal because GHO is growing fast and bringing more income to the DAO. With over 315M supply and strong liquidity on DeFi and CEX, incentives are becoming more efficient and costs per unit are going down. Phase VII keeps supporting adoption while moving Aave closer to real profitability.

Date Voted: September 24, 2025

27. Proposal: GHO Ink Launch

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal because expanding GHO to Ink will grow its utility and user base. With CCIP support and audits completed, this is a safe way to bring GHO into a new ecosystem and open more opportunities for adoption and revenue.

Date Voted: September 26, 2025

28. Proposal: [ARFC] Endorse the Asset Classification Framework (AAcA)

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR because the Asset Classification Framework makes asset onboarding clearer and more consistent. By grouping tokens by type and risk, the DAO can take smarter, safer decisions and keep Aave’s growth sustainable.

Date Voted: September 29, 2025

29. Proposal: [ARFC-Addendum] Update Merit for Round 30

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal. Updating the Merit program and adding the Aave Aligned Frens Booster seems reasonable and supports partners aligned with Aave.

Date Voted: October 3, 2025

30. Proposal: [ARFC] Add MetaMask USD (mUSD) to Aave v3 Core Instance on Ethereum and Linea

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal because mUSD is natively integrated into MetaMask, one of the most widely used wallets in web3. As a fully backed and transparent stablecoin, it can bring significant new liquidity and adoption to Aave v3 on Ethereum and Linea. The strong integration and regulatory clarity make it a valuable addition to Aave’s stablecoin markets.

Date Voted: October 6, 2025

31. Proposal: Bob Network aDI path activation

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal because it’s a technical step needed to enable Aave v3 on the Bob network.

Date Voted: October 7, 2025

32. Proposal: Aave Liquidity Committee Funding Phase VII

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal because GHO keeps growing fast and bringing more income to the DAO. Phase VII gives the ALC enough funds to support integrations and stability while using a smaller budget than before. It’s a smart move that supports growth and efficiency at the same time.

Date Voted: October 7, 2025

33. Proposal: Aave v2 Deprecation - Update

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal, as I already did during the Snapshot. It’s a smart next step to finish the safe wind-down of Aave v2. The updates raise borrow rates, clean remaining bad debt, and push users to migrate to v3 while keeping the process smooth and controlled.

Date Voted: October 7, 2025

34. Proposal: pyUSD Parameters Optimization

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal because it improves the pyUSD market setup ahead of potential PayPal incentives.

Date Voted: October 7, 2025

35. Proposal:[ARFC] Safety Module & Umbrella Emission Update

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal because it makes the Safety Module more efficient and safer for users. Reducing slashing to 0% and shortening the cooldown improves staking conditions, while the new liquidity funding helps strengthen AAVE markets.

Date Voted: October 7, 2025

35. Proposal: Steward Deployment: MainnetSwapSteward and RewardsSteward

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal because it makes Aave’s treasury operations more efficient and secure. The new stewards let the DAO manage swaps and rewards directly, without extra governance steps, while keeping all funds under DAO control.

Date Voted: October 7, 2025

35. Proposal: Claim Aave v2 stkAAVE rewards

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal because claiming the unclaimed stkAAVE rewards adds value to the DAO’s treasury instead of leaving funds idle. It’s a simple maintenance step that improves treasury efficiency and ensures all assets are properly managed.

Date Voted: October 8, 2025

36. Proposal: [ARFC] Aave v3.6 candidate

  • Vote: For

• • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal. Aave v3.6 is a smart, incremental upgrade that improves gas efficiency, simplifies logic, and gives risk teams much more flexibility with liquid eModes. The changes don’t add complexity but make the system cleaner and safer overall. A solid, focused step forward for Aave’s infrastructure.

Date Voted: October 13, 2025

37. Proposal: Full Deprecation of DPI Across Aave Deployments

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I’m in favor. DPI has been inactive for a long time, and with the Chainlink feed being deprecated, it makes sense to finalize the process. The proposed approach is low-risk, keeps accounting clean, and avoids unnecessary maintenance costs. A sensible cleanup step for the protocol.

Date Voted: October 13, 2025

37. Proposal: Adopt The SEAL Safe Harbor Agreement

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal. This is a great step for protocol security. The Safe Harbor framework gives whitehats legal protection to act fast during exploits, which can save millions in user funds. It adds an extra defensive layer without any downside for the DAO — smart, forward-looking move.

Date Voted: October 13, 2025

37. Proposal: Allow PyUSD as collateral

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I’m in favor. pyUSD is growing quickly and backed by PayPal — allowing it as collateral makes sense. Restoring the 75% LTV strengthens its utility within Aave without adding major risk.

Date Voted: October 13, 2025

37. Proposal: Gho Plasma Launch

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted yes. Deploying GHO on Plasma is the right move — Aave’s launch on Plasma has already been a huge success, and adding GHO now builds on that momentum. It strengthens GHO’s cross-chain presence and positions it as a core stablecoin in a fast, Bitcoin-secured ecosystem.

Date Voted: October 15, 2025

38. Proposal: [ARFC] TokenLogic - Phase II

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted yes. TokenLogic has delivered consistently strong results — from GHO growth to treasury efficiency — and this renewal ensures continuity. The expanded scope (GHO, sGHO, analytics) adds clear value, and the 12-month structure provides stability for long-term planning.

Date Voted: October 15, 2025

39. Proposal: [ARFC] Extend Ahab Funding

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted yes. No strong opinion on this one, but it seems helpful — giving Aave more flexibility to support new partnerships and incentive programs makes sense in the short term.

Date Voted: October 15, 2025

40. Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] Onboard frxUSD to Aave v3 Ethereum Core Instance

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: No strong opinion on this proposal, but I voted FOR as it aligns with the overall direction of the DAO

Date Voted: October 17, 2025

40. Proposal: Onboard sUSDe and USDe January expiry PT tokens on Aave V3 Plasma Instance

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted yes. No objections here — Aave’s Plasma instance has been performing really well, and adding the new Ethena PT tokens (sUSDe and USDe) feels like a natural next step to expand liquidity and utility.

Date Voted: October 17, 2025

40. Proposal: Onboard wrsETH to Aave v3 Plasma Instance

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted yes. Good addition — both wstETH and wrsETH are proven, high-quality staking assets, and bringing them to Plasma strengthens collateral diversity and user adoption on the network.

Date Voted: October 20, 2025

41. Proposal: [ARFC] Service Provider Compensation Reform for V4 Alignment

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted yes. Supporting this makes sense — it helps align all core service providers ahead of Aave v4 and keeps everyone motivated with clear KPIs and fair compensation.

Date Voted: October 20, 2025

42. Proposal: [ARFC] USDC (old) deprecation on Gnosis Chain Instance

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted yes - no objection

Date Voted: October 23, 2025

43. Proposal: [ARFC-Addendum] Update Merit for Round 33 - Adding Gate.io

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal — adding Gate.io as an Aave Aligned Fren makes sense. It strengthens partnerships with major exchanges and continues the collaborative Merit framework already in place.

Date Voted: October 23, 2025

44. Proposal: [ARFC] Evolving Resilience: Security Services for Aave v4 <> Certora

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal because Certora has proven to be a key security partner for Aave. Their work on formal verification, audits, and incident response has consistently protected the protocol. Expanding their role for Aave v4 — with fuzz testing and full-time coverage — strengthens the DAO’s security posture ahead of launch.

Date Voted: October 23, 2025

45. Proposal: [ARFC] Security Services for Aave Current Infrastructure <> Certora

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted yes. Certora has been a reliable long-term security partner for Aave, consistently delivering high-quality audits and governance reviews. The renewal is reasonable in scope and cost and ensures continuity of protection for the current infrastructure while v4 development moves forward.

Date Voted: October 23, 2025

46. Proposal: Slope2 Risk Oracle Activation On Core Ethereum, Linea

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal because activating the Slope2 Risk Oracle improves Aave’s risk management automation. It enables smoother, data-driven interest rate adjustments during liquidity stress, reducing volatility for borrowers and protecting suppliers. This is a smart upgrade that makes Aave more adaptive and resilient.

Date Voted: October 23, 2025

47. Proposal: Add Fluid Protocol to flashBorrowers on Plasma

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal — Fluid is a trusted Aave partner and has consistently added value to the ecosystem. Extending flashloan permissions to its new Plasma deployment supports integration, liquidity growth, and ecosystem consistency across networks.

Date Voted: October 23, 2025

48. Proposal: Onboard sUSDe and USDe to Aave V3 Avalanche Instance

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal — adding sUSDe and USDe to the Avalanche instance is a strong move to expand stablecoin utility and yield-bearing collateral options. With incentives from Ava Labs and proven adoption on other networks, this should drive more liquidity and user activity on Aave Avalanche.

1 Like

Date Voted: October 29, 2025

49. Proposal: [ARFC] Orbit Program Renewal - Q3 and Q4 2025

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal — the Orbit renewal ensures continued support and recognition for active delegates who strengthen Aave governance. It provides stability, fair compensation, and encourages sustained participation — especially important as I aim to contribute more directly as an Orbit delegate myself.

Date Voted: October 29, 2025

50. Proposal: [ARFC] AAVE Buybacks program: An update

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal — a permanent AAVE buyback program strengthens long-term token value, optimizes treasury use, and aligns incentives across the DAO. With TokenLogic and the AFC managing execution, it ensures disciplined capital deployment and sustained buy pressure backed by real protocol revenue.

Date Voted: October 29, 2025

51. Proposal: [ARFC] Aave DAO <> BGD Labs. Phase 6 & Project E

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal — BGD Labs has been a cornerstone of Aave’s technical progress and security, and Phase 6 ensures that continuity. The addition of Project E is an exciting step that lets BGD innovate independently while still sharing 55 % of revenues with the DAO — a true win-win for sustainability, innovation, and ecosystem growth.

Date Voted: October 29, 2025

52. Proposal: [ARFC] Aave V4 Security Funding

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal — a strong, multi-layered security program is essential before Aave V4’s mainnet launch. The $1.5 M budget is well-structured, with Aave Labs pre-funding costs and only reimbursing verified expenses. This ensures accountability while giving the DAO confidence that V4 will launch with top-tier audit coverage and formal verification.

Date Voted: October 29, 2025

53. Proposal: Extend Ahab Funding

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal — it’s a smart way to give Aave’s growth teams more flexibility while reducing governance overhead. The extended Ahab funding ensures that partnerships like Plasma, X Layer, and Ink can scale faster, with liquidity incentives deployed efficiently through existing infrastructure. It also supports broader GHO adoption and maintains sound treasury management practices.

Date Voted: October 31, 2025

54. Proposal: Addition of cbBTC/Stablecoin E-Mode to Aave V3 Base Instance

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal — adding a dedicated cbBTC Stablecoin E-Mode on Base is a logical next step. cbBTC has shown strong price stability, deep liquidity, and institutional backing through Coinbase custody.

Date Voted: October 31, 2025

54. Proposal: USDC (old) deprecation on Gnosis Chain Instance

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this — consolidating liquidity into the USDC.e market on Gnosis improves efficiency and simplifies Aave’s ecosystem.

Date Voted: November 05, 2025

55. Proposal: Security Services for Aave v4 <> Certora

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR — Certora has been a key security partner for Aave for years, and their expanded scope for V4 ensures thorough audits, formal verification, and continuous monitoring — exactly what’s needed for a secure launch.

Date Voted: November 05, 2025

56. Proposal: Security Services for Aave Current Infrastructure <> Certora

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR — Certora’s continued support strengthens Aave’s security and ensures reliable governance reviews and incident response for the existing infrastructure.

Date Voted: November 05, 2025

57. Proposal: Service Provider Compensation Reform for V4 Alignment

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR — this reform brings fairness and accountability by aligning all major service providers with clear KPIs ahead of the V4 launch, ensuring stronger coordination and transparent value delivery.

Date Voted: November 10, 2025

58. Proposal: Safety Module Emissions Update

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR — this reform brings fairness and accountability by aligning all major service providers with clear KPIs ahead of the V4 launch, ensuring stronger coordination and transparent value delivery.

Date Voted: November 10, 2025

59. Proposal: Reinstate Supply and Borrow Caps on Aave V3 Gnosis Instance

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR — restoring normal supply and borrow caps on Gnosis makes sense now that the bridge is reopening. It helps reestablish healthy lending activity and market efficiency without adding unnecessary risk.

Date Voted: November 10, 2025

60. Proposal: Orbit Program Renewal - Q3 and Q4 2025

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR — the Orbit Program plays an important role in supporting active delegates and strengthening decentralization within the DAO. I also hope to contribute directly in future rounds to help advance Aave’s governance and community engagement.

1 Like

Date Voted: November 17, 2025

60. Proposal: Freeze wstETH Plasma

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR — freezing wstETH on Plasma makes sense given Lido’s upcoming redeployment via Chainlink CCIP. It’s a clean transition step to ensure future compatibility and avoid confusion with the outdated token version.

Date Voted: November 17, 2025

61. Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] Onboard Strata srUSDe January expiry PT tokens to V3 Core Instance

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I’m voting FOR — PT tokens are in strong demand on Aave, and the srUSDe variant brings meaningful user demand and higher yields. Adding it to the Core instance expands collateral options without introducing significant risk and further strengthens the Ethena integration.

Date Voted: December 02, 2025

62. Proposal: [TEMP CHECK] Focussing the Aave V3 Multichain Strategy

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I’m voting for the Aave v3 Multichain Strategy: focusing on the high-value chains makes total sense for Aave.

Date Voted: December 08, 2025

63. Proposal: [ARFC] Onboard USDG to Aave V3 Core Instance

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR because adding USDG strengthens Aave’s stablecoin offering with a highly regulated, fully backed asset from Paxos. USDG brings more choice for users, deeper liquidity, and potentially new demand for borrowing and supplying without introducing collateral risk at this stage. The Chainlink feed is already live, the parameters are conservative, and Paxos exploring incentives could further boost adoption. Basically: low risk, clear utility, and positive for Aave’s core market.

Date Voted: December 08, 2025

64. Proposal: XAUt Supply Cap and Debt Ceiling Adjustment on Aave V3 Core Instance

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal because XAUt clearly has strong user demand, deep liquidity, and healthy collateral behavior. The market has matured since listing, pricing efficiency has improved, and liquidations would remain safe even at higher utilization. Increasing the debt ceiling and supply cap simply unlocks more capital efficiency for users without adding meaningful risk to Aave.

Date Voted: December 08, 2025

65. Proposal: Alter mUSD Oracle Price Implementation

  • Vote: For

  • Rationale: I voted FOR this proposal because switching mUSD to a fixed 1 USD oracle removes manipulation risks and makes the market safer.