[ARFC] AMPL Interest Rate Updates on V2 Ethereum
Vote: Yes
Rationale: We are in support of the AMPL Interest Rate Update which will reflect the current realities on the AMPL in Aave V2 Ethereum.
[ARFC] Introducing “Frontier” - Staking as a Service for the Aave DAO
Vote: Yes
Rationale: We support this proposal because it is a great example of leveraging the DAO’s existing assets to create additional value. By leveraging Aave DAO’s large Liquid Staking Derivative Token holdings to create additional yield, the DAO not only generates additional yield but also assumes an active role in the LST ecosystem.
This measured approach to utilize the DAOs LST holdings is led by the Aave Chan Initiative, in our perspective kicking off this initiative with a 4 ETH Trial run across 32 Stader Pools is a conservative and calculated approach to testing the viability of the Aave DAOs participation as a validator.
StkGHO Activation
Vote: Yes
Rationale: We support deploying StkGHO with the selected parameters because they are better suited to the StkGHO launch parameters in our opinion, by creating additional utility for GHO through these staking incentives, the Aave DAO can incentivise individuals to use GHO as a store value instead of an arbitrage opportunity.
[ARFC] Add PYUSD to Aave v3 Ethereum Market
Vote: Yes
Rationale: We support adding PYUSD to Aave V3 on the basis that Aave needs to continue adding diverse assets to its markets, stablecoin diversity is essential as Aave continues to grow.
[ARFC] Gauntlet USDC.e Supply and Borrow Cap Recommendation on Optimism Aave v3
Vote: No
Rationale: While we see the opportunity to increase revenue through increasing the caps for USDC.e, we must insist that users should be indirectly incentivised to switch to native USDC.
Request for Bounty Payout - January 2024
Vote: Yes
Rationale: We are in support of rewarding bug bounty contributors for the month of January. By compensating security contributors, the Aave DAO continues sending a signal that future vulnerabilities which are disclosed through true proper channels will be adequately rewarded.
[ARFC] Add sFRAX on Ethereum V3
Vote: Yes
Rationale: We support the addition of sFRAX to the Aave V3 Ethereum market, in our opinion, the sFRAX token which enables holders to receive a percentage of Frax Protocol revenue is an excellent addition to Aave V3 due to the success of the Frax Protocol and the utility which is unlocked for the token.
Reserve Factor Updates (Jan 15, 2024)
Vote: Yes
Rationale: We support this proposal which encourages Polygon Aave V2 users to port their positions over to Aave V3 Polygon.
GHO Stability Module
Vote: Yes
Rationale: There have been several strategies employed to try to get GHO to peg, strategies such as consistently increasing the borrow rate for GHO. The time has come to explore using the GHO Stability Module to capture GHO’s peg and maintain it, with the lower caps proposed by Option B, we can limit how much GHO can be minted to facilitate large-scale market selling of GHO. The results of launching the GSM now as opposed to later are not set in stone or certain, but it is our opinion that we should not delay what could be a valuable step to getting GHO to peg.
[ARFC] Recommendation to freeze and set LTV to 0 for SUSHI on Aave v3 Polygon
Vote: Yes
Rationale: Due to the amount of risk SUSHI adds to the Aave Protocol, and the minimal reserve growth it contributes, we are in support of reducing the LTV for SUSHI to 0 on the Aave V3 Polygon Market.|
[ARFC] Recommendation to freeze and set LTV to 0 for CRV on Aave v3 Polygon
Vote: Yes
Rationale: Due to the additional risk that CRV adds and the minimal growth it offers to Aave’s Reserve, we are in support of reducing the LTV for CRV to 0 on the Aave V3 Polygon Market.
[ARFC] Recommendation to freeze and set LTV to 0 for BAL on Aave v3 Polygon
Vote: Yes
Rationale: Due to the low risk-to-reward ratio the BAL offers to Aave’s Reserve Growth, we are in support of reducing the LTV for BAL to 0 on the Aave V3 Polygon Market.
[ARFC] Recommendation to freeze and set LTV to 0 for DPI on Aave v3 Polygon
Vote: Yes
Rationale: Due to the risk-to-reward ratio the DPI offers to the Aave Protocol, we are in support of reducing the LTV for DPI to 0 on the Aave V3 Polygon Market.
[ARFC] Gauntlet USDC.e Supply and Borrow Cap Recommendation on Optimism Aave v3
Vote: No
Rationale: While we see the opportunity to increase revenue through increasing the caps for USDC.e, we must insist that users should be indirectly incentivised to switch to native USDC.|
[ARFC] Modify Retroactive bug bounties proposal (pre-Immunefi)
Vote: YAE - Option 3
Rationale: While this has been a controversial governance process it is important that bounties are not increased or decreased arbitrarily, the approach to communication from the Security Researcher was poor, and in our opinion, BGD Labs has been fair in its assessment. For that reason, we are voting in favour of paying out the bounties as submitted by BGD Labs.
Update ETH EMode and WETH Risk Params on Aave v3 Ethereum, Optimism and Arbitrum
Vote: Yes
Rationale: We support this proposal which adjusts the interest rates for WETH, stETH across Ethereum, Optimism and Arbitrium. We agree that by adjusting these parameters we can make Aave the preferable destination to deposit these assets while creating value for the Aave Protocol and its users.