Thanks for the detailed reply. I appreciate the improved tone and community engagement. However, we’re still avoiding the elephant in the room.
The Core Governance Problem:
How will you address the voting power centralization issue? According to multiple forensic analyses, Labs and the founder control 600K+ voting power (likely significantly more). This has never been officially disclosed.
Why This Matters:
This concentration creates hyper-centralization regardless of whatever AAVE tokens you’re requesting in this proposal. You currently possess sufficient power to:
∙ Pass any proposal unilaterally
∙ Veto any community initiative
What’s Needed Before Progress:
-
Complete voting power disclosure - all Labs/founder-controlled wallets
-
Clear governance policy - limiting concentration and requiring transparency
Without addressing this fundamental issue, we’re just rearranging deck chairs.