Well, since I didn’t work on the design of AAVE
I just hope the technical team, aave.com, can technically limit this user’s easy money scam, if they can limit his transfers or make it harder for him to scam community members, it would be a healthy development for the AAVE community, instead of always discussing , decentralization, the existence of the community and decentralization is a pseudo proposition.
Decentralization = easy money scam? No consideration for the development of the community? If so, why do communities exist?
What is the point of why communities exist? Why do people vote? How about we all talk about how to scam, or scam for money. It would be nice to become rich, it’s very dark. I don’t want that.
But the community still needs members who are pushing him to join, but it requires them to really love the AAVE community, so it’s not fair to the people who really support the community and in a way, they don’t want to make money from AAVE.
So in my eyes, AAVE is not 100% decentralized, it’s a community token, it’s more of an ETH tool, it’s more of a “chomer plugin”, a token that grows by each member’s vote, and it wouldn’t exist without the support of everyone in the community.
I think AAVE died when it was abandoned in 2017, when it name is lend , and it wouldn’t have grown into the AAVE it is today without people like me backing him and some programmers in the community coming to keep maintaining him afterwards. So what? For a user who has supported the community for 5 years, it’s silly to always discuss AAVE = decentralization.
In the end, I don’t want my money back, I just want everyone to see that if I have enough money and I buy 60% of the AAVE token, then I am the one who decides if the community lives or dies?
AAVE = decentralized tokens? Really?
Or, AAVE = united community token