Rationale: I support this proposal. Integrating AUSD can help Aave attract more users, boost liquidity, and strengthen its ecosystem on Avalanche with a cost-efficient and stable asset.
Rationale: The proposal will help Aave Dao to increase revenue through transaction fees and interest from the Lido Instance. I think it’s a good way to boost growth for the platform.
Rationale: Voted yes since I believe this proposal will help the DAO generate revenue by lending GHO on the Lido instance. Also, adding GHO to Lido will increase demand for it, which could boost its value.
Rationale: I am all for it. This is the good chance to for Aave to expand into the Bitcoin DeFi space, reach new Bitcoin users, and grow lending/borrowing activity on the platform.
Rationale: I support this proposal since I believe adding E-Mode for cbBTC/WBTC will let users borrow more on Aave, boosting revenue, liquidity, and attract new users to the platform.
Rationale: I support this proposal since I believe adding E-Mode for tBTC/WBTC will let users borrow more on Aave, boosting revenue, liquidity, and attract new users to the platform.
Rationale: I think this collab will definitely boost Aave TVL and user growth. Also lower transaction costs and ensure long-term incentives, especially with GHO growing on Metis.
Rationale: No reason to object here. Scroll is a promising Ethereum Layer 2, and this integration gives Aave a chance to lead lending on a fast-growing network.
Rationale: I support this proposal as it’s a good strategy to improve capital efficiency in Aave, attract more liquidity, and expand options for users.
Rationale: I voted yes because I agree with ACI that adjusting the Reserve Factor and UOptimal will boost Aave’s revenue and improve the ability to meet growing borrowing demand.
Rationale: I voted yes because moving assets from Polygon, Arbitrum, and Optimism to Ethereum will help Aave better manage and optimize the DAO’s funds in a more focused ecosystem
