Rationale: Voted yes with same reason on Snapshot. Integrating AUSD can help Aave attract more users, and strengthen the ecosystem on Avalanche with a cost-efficient and stable asset.
Rationale: BOB is a good opportunity to expand and grow liquidity for Aave. With $250M TVL post-launch, Aave can expect significant revenue from BOB users. Voted yes.
Rationale: Of course, I voted yes! :) The incentives are really great for Aave community, and this will help Aave expand smoothly while easing the financial load of moving to a new platform.
Rationale: I think this proposal can helps reduce liquidity issues and makes risk management easier. Also, bumping up the liquidation buffer from 3% to 4% will give Aave better protection against unexpected liquidations. Voted yes, of course
Rationale: All these upgrades benefit Aave users on Gnosis by adding more options for collateral and borrowing under better conditions. Easy yes from me!
Rationale: Obviously yes :). Security is the #1 priority for a big protocol like Aave. The contest will ensure the code gets thoroughly reviewed by top external experts.
Rationale: So Aave will become one of the first DeFi platforms to launch on Rootstock, attracting a large number of users to Aave :).
And Aave can boost liquidity and attract users with RootstockLabs and partners committing 500 BTC to Aave’s pools on Rootstock, ensuring enough liquidity from the start. Of course, voting Yes!
Rationale: Aave can attract more users from Ethena and EtherFi while also boosting liquidity and trading volume through ZK token incentives offered by these protocols. Voted for!
Rationale: Voting yes! I think Aave can manage GHO’s risk better with this proposal. Plus, expanding GHO on Ethereum will create more opportunities for trading and borrowing for users.
Rationale: Voting for with same reason on Snapshot. Adding LBTC/WBTC with E-Mode could bring in more users from other platforms with better borrowing rates.
Rationale: This proposal will boost GHO borrowing activity on Prime. Obviously lowering the rate might reduce income per loan, but with more borrowing, Aave could see even higher overall revenue. Voting For!
Rationale: Voting yes :). This proposal not only improves Aave’s current operations but also lays a strong foundation for long term growth in a multichain ecosystem.
Rationale: Easy yes from me! Aave can boost revenue by capturing MEV. It also optimizes the liquidation process while protecting users from unfair risks.
Voting For!
Rationale: This proposal makes sense to me. Freezing the stMATIC reserve helps prevent unnecessary supply of an asset that’s no longer useful and reducing financial risks on Aave.
Rationale: Lowering the wstETH borrow rate will encourage more borrowing of wstETH, boosting Aave’s revenue. Plus, it’ll promote the use of LRTs and help increase liquidity. Voted yes on snapshot
Declining Supply and Liquidity: pufETH’s total supply and DEX liquidity have sharply decreased, with liquidity now at just $5.9M, indicating reduced market interest.
Lack of Demand: Minimal new mints and a significant drop in validator cap suggest low demand for pufETH.
Risks: Exposure to double-slashing, pricing complexity due to its validator ticket model, and no active bug bounty program pose significant risks.
The potential price volatility actually concerns me too. So risks outweigh the benefits.
Listing can be reconsidered if there are signs of growth.
Rationale: This proposal can hell to optimize risk management and reduce delays in updating supply caps, especially in this fast changing market conditions, Aave will respond quickly to user demand.
Rationale: Voted for with same reason on Snapshot. Freezing the stMATIC reserve helps prevent unnecessary supply of an asset that’s no longer useful and reducing financial risks on Aave.
Rationale: Clearly lowering the borrow rates for USDS and GHO will make Aave more attractive to borrowers.
Especially with GHO borrow rate reduction, it will encourage users to borrow GHO over other stablecoins. GHO will become a more popular stablecoin and boost Aave’s liquidity.
Rationale: Voted for with same reason on Snapshot. This is just a small adjustment with benefits, no extra costs or risks, but it unlocks economic value for both users and DAO.