Rationale: This update balances better capital use with stable rates, while bringing in more revenue for the DAO and keeping ETH markets competitive for users. Voted yes!
Rationale: This proposal helps Aave standardize and streamline the token listing process by introducing early filtering based on asset class. This approach saves Service Provider resources, and ensures that suitable tokens are processed more efficiently.
Rationale: Voting For. This proposal enables tETH holders to access deeper stablecoin liquidity via Core while maintaining strict risk controls. Also the migration addresses strong stablecoin demand unmet in Prime and can drive healthy growth in Core’s utilization and revenue.
Rationale: I support adding ezETH to Aave v3 Core. This proposal will improve capital efficiency between Core and Prime, help balance wstETH borrow rates, and meet user demand for stablecoin access via eMode
Rationale: Voted Yes on this Tempcheck. Adding LsETH to Aave v3 Core brings in a fast growing liquid staking token with strong security and compliance backing.
This integration can attract both institutional and individual users and unlock additional TVL through post TGE incentives.
Rationale: Support onboarding PT tUSDe (Dec expiry) in this Tempcheck.
It can drive TVL growth, leverage deep USDe liquidity, and generate meaningful fee revenue for Aave. Looking forward to reviewing the detailed risk parameters from service providers.
Rationale: Voted yes with same reason on Temcheck phase.
Gold backed assets represent a unique opportunity to diversify collateral types within Aave. XAUt can offer users a hedge against crypto market volatility and help attract new participants who are more familiar with traditional assets like gold.
Also, isolation mode + $3M ceiling ensure risk control while opening the door to new users and markets.
tBTC has already shown strong demand on Ethereum, with the supply cap repeatedly filled and expanded. Bringing tBTC to Aave v3 on Base will add trusted BTC liquidity, creates more options for users to borrow/lend, and strengthens Aave’s market position in the trust-minimized BTC sector.
Rationale: I support onboarding rsETH to Linea V3.
The asset is already approved and integrated across multiple Aave deployments, this is a solid risk profile. Extending it to Linea will enhance user options and strengthen Aave’s position in the growing Linea ecosystem.
Rationale: Support with same reason on Snapshot. Clear and legitimate recovery of earned rewards from an immutable contract. No extra cost or risk to Aave.
Rationale: Support to onboard tBTC on Aave Arbitrum. It will bring more Bitcoin into DeFi, add revenue, and make Aave less reliant on centralized wrapped BTC.
Rationale: I will be voting no, not because I disagree with Horizon as an initiative, but because I believe the proposal in its current form risks dividing the DAO when it should be a unifying step forward.
The edits made: no Horizon token, a fair 50/50 revenue split, and GHO integration, are real improvements. Still, as bgdlabs and ACI said, there are unresolved concerns around governance structure, versioning, and process.
I understand that Horizon timely launch is important from business perspective. But the concerns raised are not minor detail. And as EzR3aL said, “given that SP have a different job and thus view on this proposal, it’s only fair to raise these concerns/questions.”
So my vote is not meant as opposition to Horizon, but as a call for reunification: to clarify roles, publish a roadmap for upgrades, and improve coordination before activation. This could be done in a timely manner (perhaps weeks?)
Horizon should be a win win, and after having agreed on MAJOR concessions, the final mile of alignment would have made the DAO stronger.
Rationale: Voted yes with same reason on Snapshot vote. tBTC has already shown strong demand on Ethereum, with the supply cap repeatedly filled and expanded.
Bringing tBTC to Aave v3 on Base will createsmore options for users to borrow/lend and strengthens Aave’s market position in the trust minimized BTC sector.
Rationale: Gold backed assets represent a unique opportunity to diversify collateral types within Aave.
XAUt can offer users a hedge against crypto market volatility and help attract new participants who are more familiar with traditional assets like gold.
Also, isolation mode + $3M ceiling ensure risk control while opening the door to new users and markets.
Rationale: Deploying GHO on Plasma from inception ensures that GHO is positioned as a core stablecoin in a Bitcoin secured, EVM compatible ecosystem. Voted yes!
Rationale: Voted yes. The updates improve capital efficiency ahead of the DRIPs campaign on Arbitrum, align LRTs with wstETH risk profiles, and strengthen liquidity options across both Arbitrum and Core.
Rationale: Moving Close Factor to 100% enables smoother and more complete liquidations, while the adapted ClinicStewardV2 gives the DAO controlled tools to clean up historic bad debt using Collector funds.
Rationale: Whitelisting Fluid on Polygon and Avalanche enables efficient flashloan usage for leverage, eMode, and collateral management, while the explicit restriction on position migration outside Aave mitigates systemic risk.
Rationale: Support onboarding USDG to Aave V3 Core Instance. Paxos has a strong regulatory track record, and USDG is fully backed by cash and short term U.S.
Adding USDG strengthens Aave’s stablecoin diversity and opens the door for future adoption incentives.
Rationale: Voted yes with same reason on snapshot vote. Whitelisting Fluid on Polygon and Avalanche enables efficient flashloan usage for leverage, eMode, and collateral management, while the explicit restriction on position migration outside Aave mitigates systemic risk.
Increasing the rsETH supply cap on Aave V3 Linea addresses strong market demand and unlocks additional capital efficiency.
rsETH has already demonstrated a reliable risk profile across multiple Aave deployments, making this a low risk adjustment that supports growth of both Aave and the Linea ecosystem.
Rationale: Voting yes. Adding EURC to Aave V3 on Avalanche expands Aave’s stablecoin offering beyond USD, bringing Euro denominated liquidity to the protocol.
This listing diversifies user options, attracts European users, and enhances overall liquidity for borrowing and lending on Aave.
Rationale: This proposal takes a balanced approach to strengthen Aave’s economics by reducing Safety Module and Umbrella emissions, removing slashing risk, shortening cooldowns, and introducing more efficient liquidity provisioning.
Rationale: This is a reasonable move. Moving Close Factor to 100% enables smoother and more complete liquidations, while the adapted ClinicStewardV2 gives the DAO controlled tools to clean up historic bad debt using Collector funds.
GHO’s trajectory demonstrates healthy growth and resilience, with supply increasing from 200M to 315M and a consistently tight peg supported by robust liquidity across major venues.
The proposed budget reduction signals responsible capital efficiency, while new initiatives. will enhance stability and user adoption.
Rationale: Adding mUSD strengthens Aave’s position by tapping into MetaMask’s large user base and supporting Linea’s growth.
The conservative risk setup limits downside while enabling new stablecoin demand. I’m voting Yes.
Rationale: A reasonable move. Moving Close Factor to 100% enables smoother and more complete liquidations, while the adapted ClinicStewardV2 gives the DAO controlled tools to clean up historic bad debt using Collector funds.
Rationale: This proposal takes a balanced approach to strengthen Aave’s economics by reducing Safety Module and Umbrella emissions, removing slashing risk, shortening cooldowns, and introducing more efficient liquidity provisioning.