Rationale: Support moving this proposal to the next stage.
Listing USDai and sUSDai could bring innovation and new stable assets to Aave, but we’ll need more details from Risk Service Providers and the USDai team in the ARFC phase.
Rationale: DPI is inactive with minimal exposure, and its Chainlink feed is ending. This proposal safely finalizes its removal and simplifies maintenance
Rationale: This adoption enhances Aave’s security by giving whitehats legal protection and clear procedures to act during exploits, improving response speed and fund recovery with no added risk.
Rationale: Voted yes. This deployment expands GHO to a secure, high speed Bitcoin sidechain, boosting its liquidity, adoption, and alignment with Aave’s cross chain strategy.
Rationale: This is a efficient funding mechanism that allows the DAO to act faster when supporting new deployments and strategic partnerships.
It also strengthens Aave’s financial management capabilities and facilitates faster execution while maintaining alignment with the protocol’s long term objectives.
Rationale: Supporting the onboarding of PT_USDe_15JAN2026 and PT_sUSDe_15JAN2026 allows Aave to capture a new stream of high quality collateral originating from the rapidly growing Ethena and Pendle ecosystems.
Rationale: Onboarding wstETH and wrsETH to Aave v3 Plasma will strengthen the network’s collateral base with two of the most trusted LST and LRT assets.
This expansion will also enhance user choice and aligns risk parameters with proven deployments.
Rationale: Vote Yes to consolidate liquidity into Circle-backed USDC.e, improve capital efficiency, and simplify risk management while ensuring a smooth migration for users.
Rationale: Supporting this proposal strengthens Aave on Plasma by safely adding a USDT-native yield asset with strong demand and conservative risk settings.
The update aligns with the purpose of the Merit program like rewarding ecosystem-aligned contributors and partners and supports broader growth through reputable integrations.
Rationale: The proposal reinforces Aave’s long term security posture through a proven collaboration with Certora.
Their formal verification and tooling have been instrumental in identifying critical issues before deployment.
I believe expanding this relationship for Aave v4 ensures a stronger, safer foundation for the next generation of the protocol while maintaining development efficiency and audit quality.
Rationale: Voting Yes. This proposal activates automated rate adjustments that make Aave’s markets more stable and responsive during stress, improving risk control without adding complexity.
BGD Labs has been a core technical pillar for Aave, ensuring security, stability, and smooth upgrades across v2, v3, and the DAO infrastructure.
Phase 6 continues this essential maintenance while introducing Project E, which expands Aave’s technology adoption with zero cost to the DAO and even revenue sharing.
Rationale: Support the proposal with same reason on Snapshot vote.
This is a efficient funding mechanism that allows the DAO to act faster when supporting new deployments and strategic partnerships.
It also strengthens Aave’s financial management capabilities and facilitates faster execution while maintaining alignment with the protocol’s long term objectives.
Rationale: Vote Yes to consolidate liquidity into Circle-backed USDC.e, improve capital efficiency, and simplify risk management while ensuring a smooth migration for users.
Rationale: Voted For onchain. This proposal continues a proven partnership with clear scope, transparent pricing, and no overlap with the Aave v4 engagement.
Rationale: Voted For with same reason on Snapshot. The proposal reinforces Aave’s long term security posture through a proven collaboration with Certora.
I believe expanding this relationship for Aave v4 ensures a stronger, safer foundation for the next generation of the protocol while maintaining development efficiency and audit quality.
Rationale: Fully support with the same reason on Snapshot vote!
BGD Labs has been a core technical pillar for Aave, ensuring security, stability, and smooth upgrades across v2, v3, and the DAO infrastructure.
Phase 6 continues this essential maintenance while introducing Project E, which expands Aave’s technology adoption with zero cost to the DAO and even revenue sharing.
Rationale: Support the proposal to maintain staking rewards for stkAAVE and stkBPT holders, keeping TVL stable and supporting the Safety Module while waiting for the upcoming Umbrella upgrade.
Rationale: Support the proposal to restore supply and borrow caps on Gnosis, ensuring lending resumes smoothly, markets stay efficient, and users can access liquidity safely.
Rationale: I support onboarding XPL to Aave Plasma.
The token now has sufficient liquidity, the parameters are conservative (collateral only, capped supply), and this will safely enable users to leverage XPL while supporting Plasma ecosystem growth.
PT-srUSDe is a well adopted asset with strong market demand and meaningful TVL.
Allowing users to supply PT-srUSDe improves capital efficiency for those already active in the Ethena and Pendle ecosystems, while also attracting new liquidity to Aave.
Rationale: This is a necessary safeguard while Lido and Chainlink redeploy the token to align with their updated cross chain architecture.
The current supply on Plasma is minimal, and freezing now prevents users from interacting with an asset that is being deprecated, reducing operational and cross chain risk.
Rationale: This proposal ensures DAO’s ongoing initiatives remain fully funded, consolidates assets for better treasury management, maintains liquidity to support key operations like audits, Merit, and service providers.
Rationale: Voting in favor to support the adoption of Chaos Risk Agents, which standardize and secure the ingestion of risk data while keeping full DAO control.
This framework can reduce operational overhead and positions Aave for reliable risk management across all assets and future protocols.
Rationale: This proposal strengthens the protocol’s long term risk posture and makes Umbrella more aligned with how Aave is actually used today.
Expanding Umbrella’s scope also reduces concentration risk and makes the insurance framework more future proof as borrowing patterns evolve. Voting yes!