Proposal: Add support for Golem Network Token (GLM)

Governance New Asset
8

In terms of risk assessment I think that we should take into account the fact that they recently migrated and have a look at the data of the previous contract address as well.
Contract address has changed from 0xa74476443119a942de498590fe1f2454d7d4ac0d to 0x7DD9c5Cba05E151C895FDe1CF355C9A1D5DA6429.

Following the risk methodology it looks like Golem positions itself pretty well considering the risk scores:

  • smart contract risk: B+ considering a maturity of >1.5k days and >1M transfers;
  • counterparty risk: B+ considering its decentralized nature and with >100k holders;
  • market risk: C+ considering the lower average volume of 20M in the last 30 days even though it has a market cap of 469M and a normalized volatility of aprox. 0.029;

That being said, I think Golem is a solid project and it would be a great addition to the protocol.

1 Like