Seeking community sentiment on adding sfrxETH to the Aave V3 Ethereum market to enhance LST liquidity and asset diversity.
Motivation
sFrxETH is the Staked version of FrxETH from the Frax Ecosystem. Users can freely mint frxETH in exchange for ETH deposits.
The Aave-Chan Initiative supports LST diversity in Aave V3 as shown with our historical support of cbETH, rETH, and, parallel to this proposal, our support for ETHx.
I’m really eager to see new LSTs in Aave, contributing to decentralize the staking landscape. However, I’m somewhat concerned about listing sfrxETH.
TVL may have grown since the last forum post, but have all the trust assumptions and centralization risks, highlighted by @monet-supply and @WintermuteGovernancehere, been solved?
AFAIK they have not, as the v2 update has been constantly pushed back, and there’s no precise timeline for it.
Needless to mention the huge third-party risk Curve poses to sfrxETH and frxETH (as well as the entire Frax ecosystem). If any disaster were to happen to Curve and that frxETH/sfrxETH pool, Aave would rapidly notice its exposure to sfrxETH, which liquidity is also completely centralized.
imo supply caps should be tightly limited until admin controls and validator operator infra are further decentralized. That being said, frxETH liquidity is pretty decent and it seems likely that it would see healthy usage.
Agree with @monet-supply, we’re happy to support the listing of sfrxETH as it’s a solid asset that’s widely used, but we’d like to see caps reflect its lack of decentralization assuming it goes through to the next stage of the governance process.