[TEMP CHECK] Onboard sUSDe to Aave V3 on Ethereum
Vote: YAE
Summary: We support the addition of sUSDe to Aave, the product has captured a lot of mind share, has great onchain liquidity, and should be a significant revenue driver for Aave.
[ARFC] TUSD and BUSD Aave V2 Rate Amendments
Vote: YAE
Summary: We support the rate amendments to address the current bad debt growth.
[ARFC] Stablecoin IR Curve Amendment on Aave V2 and V3
Vote: Aggressive
Summary: We support the aggressive amendment as recommended in the proposal to mitigate short-term rate volatility.
[ARFC] BGD <> Aave Phase 3 (2 scopes)
Vote: For
Summary: BGD has been instrumental in pushing forwarding, fixing, and securing the Aave protocol. We support their updated scope.
[TEMP CHECK] Onboard Catapulta as Aave V3 Deployment Service Provider
Vote: YAE
Summary: One of our visions as a delegate is to support the multi-chain growth of Aave. Onboarding Catapulta fits well into this vision and we look forward to assessing their impact.
[ARFC] Chaos Labs - Borrow Cap Reductions on Aave Ethereum - 03.11.24
Vote:
Summary: We support the reduction in borrow caps and agree that given the lack of revenue generated by these riskier assets, it makes sense to limit the protocols exposure.
Generalized LT/LTV Reduction on Aave
Vote: YAE
Summary: We support the proposed LT/LTV reductions.
[ARFC] Onboard osETH to Aave V3 on Ethereum
Vote: YAE
Summary: We support the listing of osETH on Aave V3 Ethereum. We are happy with their LST design and the token has reached a sufficient enough market cap to indicate there is enough demand for a listing.
[ARFC] GHO Stewards + Borrow Rate Update
Vote: YAE
Summary: We support the changes to match the DSR rate. The GHO peg remains under pressure due to using it as a vehicle for DSR leverage.
[ARFC] Reset Aave v3 Deployment Pipeline
Vote: YAE
Summary: We support the reset. We understand that there are limited resources available for chain deployments which are highly technical and therefore, the DAO needs to prioritise chains with the best future outlook for the DAO.
[TEMP CHECK] Onboard LlamaRisk as Aave Risk Service Provider
Vote: YAE
Summary:
- Extensive experience with assessing various collateral types and their risks from a market, regulatory, and smart contract perspective, which provides a holistic overview for the DAO.
- Great emphasis on sectors relevant to Aave including LSTs, LRTs, & Stablecoins.
- Their previous experience working deeply with Curve and Prisma brings a welcomed difference in human capital that could greatly benefit Aave.
- LlamaRisk provided a great analysis of the DAI/sDAI <> USDe situation.
- In general, we really like LlamaRiskâs long-form analyses, but would suggest that they provide a perspective summary at the beginning to provide clear guidance to the DAO.
[ARFC] Avalanche v2 Reserve Factor Adjustment
Vote: YAE
Summary: We support the reserve factor adjustments in aim of migrating users from v2 to v3.
[ARFC] aAMPL interim distribution
Vote: For
Summary: We support providing compensation to affected aAMPL users. We always believe that the DAO should reimburse users for any relevant bugs.
[TEMP CHECK] Onboard ezETH to Aave V3 Ethereum
Vote: Abstain
Summary: The LRT market has a lot of demand at the moment and itâs great to see Aave beginning to support relevant markets.
But we would like to see some caution with selecting which assets will be listed. ezETH is a protocol with $2.3b in TVL and a single audit from Halborn and does not offer native withdrawals, meaning $2.3b worth of ezETH relies on a $72M Balancer pool to facilitate its redemption of ETH.
In comparison, weETH (EtherFi) has 6 audits with native withdrawals.
We will be abstaining from voting in the temp check and if passed, we will wait for bgdlabs & chaos labs analysis at the AFRC stage. However, we are inclined to vote no unless conservative caps are imposed.
[TEMP CHECK] Onboard OpenBlock as Aave Risk Service Provider
Vote: YAE
Summary:
- Extensive experience working with LRTs, LST, incentive management, and growth.
- We find their dashboards to be quite useful and informative and can see them working well with initiatives like Merit.
- On the risk side, their demonstrated experience seems rather limited and they lack prior work with lending markets which we think is pretty crucial.
- There also seems to be a large overlap with the services offered by Chaos Labs, which is not a bad thing, but something to consider.
- In all honesty, we think OpenBlock would fit much better into a growth role in Aave DAO given their prior experience, expertise, and infrastructure.
- They also did not provide any form of analysis during the DAI risk parameter changes.
[ARFC] Onboard wbETH to Aave v3 BNB Chain
Vote: YAE
Summary: We support the listing of wbETH. LSTs have proven PMF within Aave and wbETH has a large enough market cap to expect enough demand to justify the listing.
[ARFC] Risk Parameters for DAI Update
Vote: Conservative
Summary:
This seems like a pretty natural response given the pace at which Maker are onboarding sUSDe, but we should take a step back to wait on further analysis from Chaos Labs (or other risk partys willing to provide some additional analysis).
Firstly, we are against fully offboarding DAI as collateral and think such a decision is a bit too harsh and unjustified. Aaveâs DAI & sDAI market across all deployments totals ~$368.2M with an avg. utilization rate of ~88% (excl. sDAI supplies), which is small relative to Aaveâs total TVL but still significant nonetheless. A full offboarding cuts off a decent portion of Aaveâs user base and revenue which will likely increase with the launch of MakerDAOâs Endgame subDAO farms.
Secondly, we do agree that DAIâs risk profile has increased and the DAO should act in response by adjusting risk params that we can all agree on are sufficient given the heightened risk profile of DAI. Pending Chaos Labsâ analysis, we should have sufficient time for ample discussion as the 600M sUSDe increase will not happen overnight.
Monet Supply has provided a good thread on the current and future risk situation for MakerDAO under their sUSDe expansion https://twitter.com/MonetSupply/status/1775210473605980407 .
Tl;dr:
- Current 100M exposure is ~2% of DAI backing
- 600M will represent ~12% of DAI backing, achieved gradually overtime
- Morpho vault overcollaterlization sitting at avg. of 12.3% excess capital
- Maker surplus buffer sitting at 61M DAI
- $140M in MKR/DAI POL acting as a potential backstop and venue for on-chain liquidations
- Ethenaâs insurance fund sits at $27.5M
Futhermore, USDe will arguably become more robust with the nearing addition of BTC-based perp yield farming.
[ARFC-Addendum] Update Boosters & diluters for Merit Round 2
Vote: Conservative Option
Summary: Merit has already done a great job at realigning users to Aave and therefore, opted for the more conservative option. We understand the reasoning as to why sDAI should not be incentivized with protocol revenue.
[ARFC] - Chaos Labs Engagement Amendment
Vote: YAE
Summary: Chaos Labs has been a tremendous value add for Aave and have proven to go above and beyond first, while asking for compensation second. We support their requested increase.
Disclaimer: Wintermute is an investor in Chaos Labs.
[ARFC] Onboard New Risk Service Provider
Vote: Onboard LlamaRisk
Summary:
LlamaRisk
- Extensive experience with assessing various collateral types and their risks from a market, regulatory, and smart contract perspective, which provides a holistic overview for the DAO.
- Great emphasis on sectors relevant to Aave including LSTs, LRTs, & Stablecoins.
- Their previous experience working deeply with Curve and Prisma brings a welcomed difference in human capital that could greatly benefit Aave.
- LlamaRisk provided a great analysis of the DAI/sDAI <> USDe situation.
- In general, we really like LlamaRiskâs long-form analyses, but would suggest that they provide a perspective summary at the beginning to provide clear guidance to the DAO.
OpenBlock
- Extensive experience working with LRTs, LST, incentive management, and growth.
- We find their dashboards to be quite useful and informative and can see them working well with initiatives like Merit.
- On the risk side, their demonstrated experience seems rather limited and they lack prior work with lending markets which we think is pretty crucial.
- There also seems to be a large overlap with the services offered by Chaos Labs, which is not a bad thing, but something to consider.
- In all honesty, we think OpenBlock would fit much better into a growth role in Aave DAO given their prior experience, expertise, and infrastructure.
- They also did not provide any form of analysis during the DAI risk parameter changes.
Allez Labs
- Allez Labs had a great application that was well defined and clear. We appreciated their emphasis on scope and deliverables which was much better than the other applications.
- We value their extensive experience working with Aave and their input into the design of GHO and the GSM. However, it should be acknowledged that GHOâs launch was not perfect and it has taken a massive amount of uplift from the DAO and service providers to get it close to peg.
- We wouldâve liked to have seen examples of tooling, infrastructure, or any form of risk analysis that they have previously done to get a better understanding of the type of work we expect to see.
- They also provided a great analysis of the DAI risk parameter changes.
- In comparison to the other two candidates, a lot of their work is limited to Aave which is not a bad thing but we do value the experience LlamaRisk and OpenBlock could potentially bring to Aave.
After assessing all Risk Service Provider applications we think LlamaRisk complements Chaos Labs the best. They bring extensive knowledge outside of Aave that is super relevant and we think their holistic analysis of collateral assets will be valuable for the Aave DAO.
[ARFC] âMerit is Foreverâ Reward System Program Extension
Vote: YAE
Summary: Merit has proven to be successful in its mission. We think itâs appropriate for the DAO to continue with such efforts and we support the proposed mandate.
[TEMP CHECK] GHO Cross-Chain Rollout Plan - First Network
Vote: Arbitrum
Summary: Arbitrum is the liveliest Ethereum L2 with a very strong DeFi ecosystem. We think itâs the best place for GHO to be deployed initially.
[TEMP CHECK] Introducing âFastPassâ - A Safety Module Update
Vote: YAE
Summary: We are supportive of this idea and agree that it complements the Safety Module nicely and helps with GHO-sided demand.
[TEMP CHECK] Onboard ggAVAX to Aave V3 on Avalanche
Vote: YAE
Summary: While we were initially supportive in the Temp Check stage, analysis by Chaos Labs has recommended for the DAO to not list ggAVAX which we agree with especially in light of recent risk efforts to offboard risky assets.
[ARFC] aAMPL Second Distribution
Vote: For
Summary: As with the first aAMPL distribution, we support reimbursing users that are affected by bugs.
[ARFC] Aave v3.1 activation
Vote: For
Summary: We support the proposed features/improvements within the v3.1 release.
[TEMP CHECK] Add AERO to Base V3
Vote: YAE
Summary: We were initially supportive of adding AERO as there is a strong user base and utility associated with the token. However, given the recent push to reduce risky assets on Aave and the veAERO mechanism we are worried that the protocol gets into a similar situation to CRV with onchain liquidity drying up over time.
[TEMP CHECK] Onboard tBTC to Aave v3 on Ethereum, Arbitrum and Optimism
Vote: YAE
Summary: tBTC has proven itâs resistance over time and as a result accrued a sufficient enough market cap for us to support its listing on Aave V3. Most importantly, we are aware of the continued efforts by the team to improve liquidity and integrations across DeFi.
[ARFC] ACI Phase III - âAd Astraâ
Vote: YAE
Summary: ACI continues to over-deliver on value and we are supportive of their renewal. We appreciate all the work they do in driving governance efficiency and their alignment with Aave.
[ARFC] Deprecation of Small-cap Stablecoins on V2 Ethereum
Vote: YAE
Summary: We support the initiative to reduce Aave V2âs exposure to small-cap stablecoins.
[ARFC] Onboard ggAVAX to Aave V3 on Avalanche
Vote: NAY
Summary: While we were initially supportive in the Temp Check stage, analysis by Chaos Labs has recommended for the DAO to not list ggAVAX which we agree with especially in light of recent risk efforts to offboard risky assets.
[ARFC] Renewal of Aave Guardian - 2024
Vote: YAE
Summary: We support the elected members for the renewal of Aave Guardian.
[ARFC] Safety Module stkGHO - Rewards Adjustment
Vote: YAE
Summary: We are supportive of eliminating AAVE emissions for stkGHO and replacing them with GHO. GHO rewards are more predictive and easier to manage.
*[TEMP CHECK] Add AERO to Base V3 Reproposal
Vote: NAY
Summary: We were initially supportive of adding AERO as there is a strong user base and utility associated with the token. However, given the recent push to reduce risky assets on Aave and the veAERO mechanism we are worried that the protocol gets into a similar situation to CRV with onchain liquidity drying up over time.
[ARFC] Fund USDC & USDT GSM
Vote: YAE
Summary: We support funding the GSM with USDC and USDT!