Chaos Labs Risk Stewards - Stablecoins Interest Rate Adjustment on Aave V3 - 25.10.25

Summary

In response to recent shifts in stablecoin market conditions, Chaos Labs recommends lowering the target borrow rate for major stablecoin assets from 6.50% to 6.00%, which will be implemented through the Risk Stewards process. These adjustments aim to restore optimal utilization levels and enhance overall protocol capital efficiency.

Motivation

Since early October, stablecoin utilization across Aave markets has trended downward, resulting in reduced capital efficiency for depositors and lower protocol revenue generation. Currently, utilization averages 70-75%, representing a 25% decrease from August heights.

During the June–September period, utilization levels consistently met or exceeded target thresholds, prompting the recommendation, which increased the Slope 1 parameter for stablecoins by 100 basis points. This adjustment was made in response to elevated borrowing activity, primarily driven by Ethena-based PT looping strategies and the introduction of Ethena’s Liquid Leverage Incentive program, which generated strong leveraged yields and contributed significantly to DAO income. As illustrated below, peak borrowing demand aligned closely with the maximum volume of PTs supplied on the Aave Ethereum Core instance.

A substantial portion of stablecoin borrowing during this period was collateralized with Ethena-based assets, as users were leveraging the spread differential between underlying yield and variable borrow rates. In several cases, net yields exceeded 60% APY, particularly for PTs maturing in June through September, which exhibited implied yields in the 12–20% range. Following the maturity of the September PTs, implied yields declined materially, compressing the profitability of stablecoin looping strategies and triggering a substantial reduction in borrowing demand. As a result, the aggregate supply of Ethena-related assets fell from approximately $8.5 billion on September 21 to $4 billion after the September maturities, leading to a proportional contraction in overall stablecoin borrowing activity, which decreased from $13.8 billion to approximately $9.5 billion.

While PT deployments have been limited to the Ethereum Core instance at the time, borrow demand and rates across other Aave instances mirrored this trend. Borrow rates, which averaged 5.5–6.5% in August, have since shifted to the 5.0–6.0% range, consistent with the observed drop in utilization.

Under current market conditions, elevated Slope 1 is restrictive to marginal borrowing demand, constraining utilization below target levels. To re-establish equilibrium between supply and demand and enhance capital efficiency in a lower-yield environment, a downward adjustment of the Slope 1 parameter is proposed.

Recommendation

Given the moderation in stablecoin borrowing, we recommend reducing the Slope 1 across stablecoin markets on Aave V3 to restore utilization and capital efficiency. Lowering Slope 1 will better reflect current market yields, which have reduced borrower tolerance for higher rates, and help reverse the recent decline in utilization. This adjustment stabilizes borrowing demand and supports sustainable protocol revenue in a relatively lower-yield environment.

Please note that a set of stablecoins is excluded from the focus of this analysis. Such cases are: GHO, bridged stablecoins, stablecoins currently in the deprecation process, and others.

Specification

Protocol Instance Asset Current Slope1 Recommended Slope1
Aave V3 Ethereum Core USDC 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Ethereum Core USDT 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Ethereum Core USDe 6.75% 6.25%
Aave V3 Ethereum Core USDtb 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Ethereum Core DAI 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Ethereum Core pyUSD 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Ethereum Core LUSD 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Arbitrum DAI 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Arbitrum USDT0 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Arbitrum USDC 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Optimism DAI 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Optimism USDT 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Optimism USDC 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Base USDC 6.25% 5.75%
Aave V3 Metis m.DAI 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Metis m.USDC 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Metis m.USDT 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Avalanche DAI.e 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Avalanche USDC 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Avalanche USDt 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Avalanche AUSD 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Gnosis WXDAI 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Gnosis EURe 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Gnosis USDC.e 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 BNB USDC 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 BNB USDT 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 BNB FDUSD 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Scroll USDC 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 ZkSync USDC 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 ZkSync USDT 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Linea USDC 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Linea USDT 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Celo USDT0 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Celo cUSD 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Celo USDC 6.50% 6.00%
Aave V3 Celo cEUR 6.50% 6.00%
Protocol Instance Asset Current Base Recommended Base
Aave V3 Plasma USDT0 2.50% 2.00%
Aave V3 Plasma USDe 2.50% 2.00%

Next Steps

We will move forward and implement these updates via the Risk Steward process.

Disclosure

Chaos Labs has not been compensated by any third party for publishing this AGRS recommendation.

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.

@ChaosLabs

Why keeping a base on Plasma instead of matching Ethereum curves?
Removing base would allow more borrowing, better yield for suppliers and potentially also more revenues for Aave (the increase in borrowing offsetting the removal of the base).
Also, can we get USDe kink increased and rate at kink decreased to match Ethereum given the current good liquidity on Plasma for similar reasons than above?