Rationale: I support these changes as a way to reduce bad debt risk and optimize capital use on Aave.
Cutting interest rates to 1% for high bad debt markets will help borrowers pay off their debts more easily. For assets like BUSD or FEI with high bad debt, adjusting the interest rates will match their risk levels.
Other adjustments are also reasonable to prevent new bad debt and reduce the impact of illiquid assets.
Rationale: Recognizing HyperLend as a friendly fork will bring value to Aave and its users (rev share, airdrop, HPL supply at TGE) while set precedent for other forks to share revenue. Voting yes!
Rationale: Same reason with Snapshot vote. This change will boost liquidity as users can reopen ETH collateral positions, bringing more assets back to the platform.
Rationale: Voted yes with same reason on Snapshot. It can help to optimize risk management and reduce delays in updating supply caps. Aave will respond quickly to user demand on Arbitrum.
Rationale: Voted yes with same reason on ARFC. Aave is doing the right thing to protect the ecosystem and users from potential risks like bridge attacks or vulnerabilities.
Rationale: Aave can win on both liquidity growth and attracting new users.
Plus, since rsETH isn’t borrowable, there’s less risk of liquidity drains or forced sell-offs. Voted yes!
Rationale: Aave can have a chance to attract more users from a promising L2 like Soneium. The $4M incentive alsos can boost TVL and revenue. Voted yes on TEMP CHECK stage!
Rationale: Voting yes with same reason on Snapshot! Aave can manage GHO’s risk better with this proposal. Plus, expanding GHO on Ethereum will create more opportunities for trading and borrowing for users.
Rationale: Voted YES to onboard tBTC on Aave Arbitrum. It will bring more Bitcoin into DeFi, add revenue, and make Aave less reliant on centralized wrapped BTC.
Rationale: Voted in favor on Snapshot for the same reason. This is the final step for Aave to fully shut down V2 :)
I support these changes (disabling borrowing, increasing Slope 2 to 300%, setting the Base Rate to 20%, and raising the RF to 99%) as a way to reduce bad debt risk and optimize capital use on Aave.
Rationale: Voted yes as same reason on Snapshot. Aave can win on both liquidity growth and attracting new users.
Plus, since rsETH isn’t borrowable, there’s less risk of liquidity drains or forced sell-offs.
Rationale: Voted yes with same reason of TEMPCHECK. Recognizing HyperLend as a friendly fork will bring value to Aave and its users (rev share, airdrop, HPL supply at TGE) while set precedent for other forks to share revenue.
Rationale: Voted yes with same reason of TEMPCHECK. Aave can boost revenue by capturing MEV. It also optimizes the liquidation process while protecting users from unfair risks.
Rationale: Giving this a shot. I voted yes on TEMPCHECK. Adding stS to Aave v3 on Sonic will bring value and unlock growth opportunities for Aave DAO, helping attract liquidity and strengthen Aave’s position on Sonic.