[Direct to AIP] Onboard USDe & sUSDe February expiry PT tokens on Aave V3 Core Instance

[Direct to AIP] Onboard USDe & sUSDe February expiry PT tokens on Aave V3 Core Instance

Author: ACI

Date: 2025-11-04

Proposal updated with Risk Parameters by Risk Service Providers 2025-11-10

Summary

This ARFC proposes to onboard USDe and sUSDe February expiry PT tokens on Aave V3 Core Instance.

This proposal will be a Direct to AIP.

Motivation

The previous USDe and sUSDe PT tokens that were onboarded have brought significant inflows to Aave, in preparation for the expiry and rollover we propose to onboard the next expiry of this PT token. We expect at a minimum that deposits will match those in the current expiry PT token, with potentially some sidelined demand.

Specification

PT-sUSDE-5FEB2026: Address: 0xe8483517...2f040d7b2 | Etherscan

PT-USDe-5FEB2026: Address: 0x1f84a512...d17d34350 | Etherscan

Risk Parameters

Risk parameters will be provided by Risk Service Providers and the proposal will be updated accordingly.

Parameter Value Value
Asset PT-USDe-5FEB2026 PT-sUSDe-5FEB2025
Isolation Mode No No
Borrowable No No
Collateral Enabled Yes Yes
Supply Cap 30,000,000 30,000,000
Borrow Cap - -
Debt Ceiling - -
LTV 0.05% 0.05%
LT 0.1% 0.1%
Liquidation Penalty 7.50% 7.50%
Liquidation Protocol Fee 10.00% 10.00%
E-Mode Category PT-USDe Stablecoins, PT-USDe USDe PT-sUSDe Stablecoins, PT-sUSDe USDe

PT-USDe-5FEB2025

Initial E-mode Risk Oracle

Parameter Value Value
E-Mode Stablecoins USDe
LTV 88.5% 89.3%
LT 90.5% 91.3%
LB 4.1% 3.1%

Linear Discount Rate Oracle

Parameter Value
discountRatePerYear 5.5266%
maxDiscountRatePerYear 27.163%

PT-USDe Stablecoins E-mode

Asset PT-USDe-5FEB2026 PT-USDe-27NOV2025 USDC USDT USDe USDtb
Collateral Yes Yes No No No No
Borrowable No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
LTV Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle - - -
LT Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle - - -
Liquidation Bonus Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle - - -

PT-USDe USDe E-mode

Asset PT-USDe-5FEB2026 PT-USDe-27NOV2025 USDe
Collateral Yes Yes No
Borrowable No No Yes
LTV Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle -
LT Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle -
Liquidation Bonus Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle -

PT-sUSDe-5FEB2026

Initial E-mode Risk Oracle

Parameter Value Value
E-Mode Stablecoins USDe
LTV 87.6% 88.5%
LT 89.6% 90.5%
LB 5.1% 4.1%

Linear Discount Rate Oracle

Parameter Value
discountRatePerYear (Initial) 6.1953%
maxDiscountRatePerYear 27.1629%

PT-sUSDe Stablecoins E-mode

Asset PT-sUSDe-5FEB2026 PT-sUSDe-27NOV2025 USDC USDT USDe USDtb
Collateral Yes Yes No No No No
Borrowable No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
LTV Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle - - -
LT Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle - - -
Liquidation Bonus Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle - - -

PT-sUSDe USDe E-mode

Asset PT-sUSDe-5FEB2026 PT-sUSDe-27NOV2025 USDe
Collateral Yes Yes No
Borrowable No No Yes
LTV Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle -
LT Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle -
Liquidation Bonus Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle -

Useful Links

https://docs.pendle.finance/ProtocolMechanics/YieldTokenization/PT

Disclaimer

ACI is not directly affiliated with Pendle and did not receive compensation for the creation of this proposal. Some ACI employees may hold Pendle tokens.

Next Steps

  1. Publish proposal to gather community and Service Providers feedback.
  2. Publish an AIP vote for final confirmation and enforcement of the proposal.

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived under CC0

2 Likes

Summary

LlamaRisk supports listing PT-USDe-05FEB2026 and PT-sUSDe-05FEB2026 on the Aave. At the time of this analysis, the assets mature in approximately 89 days. The reduction in the yield provided by Ethena’s USDe and its yield-bearing counterpart sUSDe has reduced demand for the PTs. However, it still remains significant, with currently $1.5B in the November PTs. Additionally, due to the more limited demand and the pools being newly deployed, their liquidity is currently limited, especially on the USDe PT; therefore, we recommend more conservative initial supply caps.

Assessment of Pendle PTs: Link

Considered PT asset maturities: PT-USDe-05FEB2026, PT-sUSDe-05FEB2026

Asset State

Asset Growth

The Ethena USDe supply has suffered significant reductions in the last month, following the 10/10 crash, which led to large USDe liquidations on Binance and an overall shift in market sentiment, impacting both the sUSDe yield and $ENA price, which is directly related to the value of Ethena’s points. The total supply of USDe is now at 8.667 billion. A significant portion of it is staked as sUSDe, with the total supply of the yield-bearing sUSDe reaching over 4.7 billion, reflecting a staking ratio of approximately 55%.


Source: LlamaRisk Ethena Risk Portal, November 7, 2025

Underlying Stability

The stability of the underlying USDe peg and the overall health of the Ethena protocol are critical risk parameters. The market price of USDe remains pegged to $1.00. From a protocol health perspective, Ethena maintains a solvency ratio of 101.8% and is supported by a Reserve Fund capitalized at over $62 million. The historical price chart shows the peg’s stability, although it also reflects the brief de-peg of 65 basis points from the 10/10 market crash.


Source: LlamaRisk, November 7, 2025

Underlying Yield Source

The primary incentives for holding USDe and sUSDe are the Ethena “sats” program and the native yield from sUSDe. The sats system provides users with multipliers for different activities.

  • USDe deposited on Pendle generates a 60x sats multiplier.
  • sUSDe deposited on Pendle generates a 20x sats multiplier on top of its underlying yield.

Market Analysis

Total Supply

The PT-sUSDe-05FEB2026 maturity pool has demonstrated sustained growth since its inception, while the PT-USDe-05FEB2026 liquidity growth has been more limited. As the November PTs mature, we expect the liquidity to rotate to the February pools as has happened with previous PTs.


Source: LlamaRisk, November 7, 2025


Source: LlamaRisk, November 7, 2025

As of November 7, 2025, the composition of the pools is as follows:

  • PT-USDe Pool:
    • Total Liquidity: $1.5M
    • SY USDe: $1.28M (83%)
    • PT USDe: $250K (16.8%)
  • PT-sUSDe Pool:
    • Total Liquidity: $4.77M
    • SY sUSDe: $3.9M (82.2%)
    • PT sUSDe: $850K (17.8%)

These liquidity levels indicate a significant decline compared to past PTs, which may impact pool stability.


Source: Pendle, November 7, 2025


Source: Pendle, November 7, 2025

Price and Yield

The implied yields for PT-USDe and PT-sUSDe reflect the market’s discount rate on the underlying assets based on the opportunity cost of earning yield and sats. These rates have remained stable since the pool launch, if the yields for both PTs continue to fluctuate around the 6.3% and 6.6% respectively we expect to see more limited demand for borrowing due to the contraction of the spread between the Aave borrow cost and the PTs yield.


Source: LlamaRisk, November 7, 2025


Source: LlamaRisk, November 7, 2025

As of this review (89 days to maturity), the implied yields are:

  • PT-USDe: ~6.3% APY
  • PT-sUSDe: ~6.6% APY

The pools have the following parameters on Pendle:

PT-sUSDe

  • Liquidity Yield Range: 3.5-25%
  • Input Tokens: sUSDe
  • AMM Fee: 0.09%
  • Orderbook Fee: 0.12%

PT-USDe

  • Liquidity Yield Range: 3.5-25%
  • Input Tokens: USDe
  • AMM Fee: 0.08%
  • Orderbook Fee: 0.1%

Maturities

The availability of multiple maturities ensures a more natural rollover of the PT pools, which is also relevant for Aave’s exposure. With the onboarding of the February PTs when the November pool expires, users will be able to migrate.


Source: Pendle, November 7, 2025

Integrated Venues

PT-USDe-05FEB2026 and PT-sUSDe-05FEB2026 are not yet integrated into other lending venues due to the recency of the pools. This represents a significant first-mover advantage for Aave to capture the primary lending demand for these assets.

Recommendations

We are aligning the risk parameter recommendations for the PT-USDe-05FEB2026 and PT-sUSDe-05FEB2026 with @ChaosLabs.

Price Feed Recommendation

For pricing both PTs tokens on Aave, a specific dynamic linear discount rate oracle has been developed by BGD Labs. It is recommended that both PT-USDe-05FEB2026 and PT-sUSDe-05FEB2026 tokens be priced using it.

Disclaimer

This review was independently prepared by LlamaRisk, a DeFi risk service provider funded in part by the Aave DAO. LlamaRisk serves as a member of Ethena’s Risk Committee and an independent attester of Ethena’s PoR solution. LlamaRisk did not receive compensation from the protocol(s) or their affiliated entities for this work. The information should not be construed as legal, financial, tax, or professional advice.

2 Likes

Overview

In alignment with our Principal Token Risk Oracle framework, outlined in detail here, we present our risk parameter recommendations for the proposed maturity and underlying asset listings: PT-USDe-5FEB2026 and PT-sUSDe-5FEB2026. Leveraging the dynamic linear discount rate oracle implementation, we also provide our recommended values for initialDiscountRatePerYear and maxDiscountRatePerYear, derived from the extended methodology detailed here.

In addition, our recent research paper, “Stress Testing Ethena: A Quantitative Look at Protocol Stability,” examines how rapidly growing deposits of Ethena’s USDe, sUSDe and especially Pendle Principal Tokens are reshaping Aave’s collateral pool and funding dynamics. It maps out both on‑chain liquidity hazards (e.g., thin PT markets, leveraged looping, rehypothecation) and backing‑side tail risks (exchange or custodian failure, collateral de‑peg, prolonged negative funding) via scenario modeling and Monte‑Carlo simulations, while proving that Aave’s current risk‑oracle floors, eMode parameterization and liquidation controls would absorb most plausible shocks. Moreover, the imminent integration of a native strategy to offload Ethena-collateralized debt, leveraging Aave’s status as a whitelisted redeemer, will considerably increase the ability to offload positions in the event of an adverse scenario, especially those with duration risk, such as PTs, as described in depth here.

Finally, our paper, “Aave’s Growing Exposure to Ethena: Risk Implications Throughout the Growth and Contraction Cycles of USDe ,” shows that contraction and stabilization dynamics within the Aave-Ethena ecosystem are closely linked. When sUSDe yields decline, leveraged positions unwind, freeing up significant stablecoin liquidity in Aave through repayments. Simultaneously, PT/USDe borrowers shift their debt into other stablecoins, generating upward price pressure on USDe precisely when redemption demand rises. Crucially, stablecoin repayments from leverage unwinders typically outweigh PT debt migration into stablecoins, creating a natural liquidity buffer. Our analysis indicates this dynamic effectively stabilizes Aave markets, comfortably absorbing potential stress even during Ethena’s withdrawal of backing assets. Overall, the current market structure supports increased exposure, provided backing deployment into Aave remains prudently managed. This asset listing reflects and incorporates the insights from the aforementioned papers.

Risk Oracle Parameter Evolution

Stablecoin E-mode

Through our rigorous quantification of the algorithm, we find that the integration risk decays as the PT approaches maturity. This justifies the use of progressively less conservative risk parameters over time. Taking into account the underlying configuration of USDe E-mode within Aave, we outline the projected evolution of the LT, LTV and LB, with the initial parameterization approximately as follows:

PT-USDe-5FEB2026

LTV: 88.5%

LT: 90.5%

LB: 4.1%

PT-sUSDe-5FEB2026

LTV: 87.6%

LT: 89.6%

LB: 5.1%

The collateral parameters will continue to become more permissive, evolving in accordance with the plot above. This set of parameters explicitly refers to E-mode, and we recommend setting non-E Mode parameters such that the asset is effectively prohibited from borrowing uncorrelated assets.

The underlying configuration will follow our previous listings of related PT assets, applying a minimum liquidation bonus of 2% and a maximum liquidation threshold of 93%.

USDe E-mode

To further enhance capital efficiency, we propose the introduction of a dedicated USDe E-mode for PT-USDe-5FEB2026 and PT-sUSDe-5FEB2026. Given that both the PT token’s underlying asset (USDe) and the debt asset share the same collateral base, the risk parameterization should not be constrained by typical underlying asset considerations. Instead, the parameterization should be driven by the Pendle AMM’s liquidity dynamics, aligning more closely with the PT’s inherent pricing structure. We outline the projected evolution of the LT, LTV and LB, with the initial parameterization approximately as follows:

PT-USDe-5FEB2026

LTV: 89.3%

LT: 91.3%

LB: 3.1%

PT-sUSDe-5FEB2026

LTV: 88.5%

LT: 90.5%

LB: 4.1%

This approach is justified by the correlation between the PT’s underlying and the debt asset, as both are effectively anchored to the same stable asset, USDe. As a result, this E-mode would allow for more efficient capital utilization.

This configuration aligns with our broader Principal Token Risk Oracle framework, which emphasizes parameter flexibility for pairs where the PT’s underlying asset is also the debt asset, ultimately supporting deeper liquidity and optimized capital efficiency.

Initial Discount Rate Per Year and Maximum Discount Rate Per Year

Based on historical observed data and the pricing configuration of the market, our initial recommendations for the discountRatePerYear and maxDiscountRatePerYear are as follows:

PT-USDe-5FEB2026

Initial discountRatePerYear: 5.5266%

maxDiscountRatePerYear: 27.1629%

PT-sUSDe-5FEB2026

Initial discountRatePerYear: 6.1953%

maxDiscountRatePerYear: 27.1629%

If pricing dynamics change until its listing, such that discountRatePerYear will require a refresh, we will institute such a change accordingly upon listing.

Supply Cap

With PT-sUSDe-5FEB2026 and PT-USDe-5FEB2026, liquidity depends on both the underlying USDe markets and Pendle’s PT/SY AMM pool, and current depth is moderate. The plot below represents the amount of liquidity available under 3% slippage as the market approaches expiry, given the current liquidity distribution in the AMM. As the market matures and moves closer to expiry, the slippage associated with swapping PT becomes less extreme. This trend is especially pronounced for assets with lower scalarRoot values, i.e. a greater expected implied yield fluctuation, and they tend to have more variance in liquidity concentration. Supported by on-chain liquidity in the Pendle AMM, the market currently facilitates swaps of up to $3.4 million and $1.4 million with less than 3% slippage in sUSDe and USDe PTs, respectively.

The SY Liquidity in PT-sUSDe-5FEB2026 and PT-USDe-5FEB2026’s AMM has reached just $4M and 1.5M within the first week of launch, indicating a moderate level of LP support, and has remained at that level since.

Migration of Existing PTs

To support a seamless migration from other PT-USDe and sUSDe assets maturing before the end of November to PT-sUSDe-5FEB2026 and PT-USDe-5FEB2026, we recommend including PT-USDe-27NOV2025 and PT-sUSDe-27NOV2025 in the newly created respective E-Modes.

Underlying Oracle

As the underlying PT-USDe is anchored to USDe, we recommend leveraging the Capped USDT/USD feed as the underlying ASSET_TO_USD_AGGREGATOR within the PT-USDe PendlePriceCapAdapter.

Specification

Parameter Value Value
Asset PT-USDe-5FEB2026 PT-sUSDe-5FEB2026
Isolation Mode No No
Borrowable No No
Collateral Enabled Yes Yes
Supply Cap 30,000,000 30,000,000
Borrow Cap - -
Debt Ceiling - -
LTV 0.05% 0.05%
LT 0.1% 0.1%
Liquidation Penalty 7.50% 7.50%
Liquidation Protocol Fee 10.00% 10.00%
E-Mode Category PT-USDe Stablecoins, PT-USDe USDe PT-sUSDe Stablecoins, PT-sUSDe USDe

PT-USDe-5FEB2026

Initial E-mode Risk Oracle

Parameter Value Value
E-Mode Stablecoins USDe
LTV 88.5% 89.3%
LT 90.5% 91.3%
LB 4.1% 3.1%

Linear Discount Rate Oracle

Parameter Value
discountRatePerYear 5.5266%
maxDiscountRatePerYear 27.1629%

PT-USDe Stablecoins E-mode

Asset PT-USDe-5FEB2026 PT-USDe-27NOV2025 USDC USDT USDe USDtb
Collateral Yes Yes No No No No
Borrowable No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
LTV Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle - - -
LT Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle - - -
Liquidation Bonus Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle - - -

PT-USDe USDe E-mode

Asset PT-USDe-5FEB2026 PT-USDe-27NOV2025 USDe
Collateral Yes Yes No
Borrowable No No Yes
LTV Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle -
LT Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle -
Liquidation Bonus Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle -

PT-sUSDe-5FEB2026

Initial E-mode Risk Oracle

Parameter Value Value
E-Mode Stablecoins USDe
LTV 87.6% 88.5%
LT 89.6% 90.5%
LB 5.1% 4.1%

Linear Discount Rate Oracle

Parameter Value
discountRatePerYear (Initial) 6.1953%
maxDiscountRatePerYear 27.1629%

PT-sUSDe Stablecoins E-mode

Asset PT-sUSDe-5FEB2026 PT-sUSDe-27NOV2025 USDC USDT USDe USDtb
Collateral Yes Yes No No No No
Borrowable No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
LTV Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle - - -
LT Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle - - -
Liquidation Bonus Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle - - -

PT-sUSDe USDe E-mode

Asset PT-sUSDe-5FEB2026 PT-sUSDe-27NOV2025 USDe
Collateral Yes Yes No
Borrowable No No Yes
LTV Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle -
LT Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle -
Liquidation Bonus Subject to Risk Oracle Subject to Risk Oracle -

Disclaimer

Chaos Labs has not been compensated by any third party for publishing this recommendation.

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0

2 Likes

@ChaosLabs you didn’t include sUSDe collateral for the sUSDe Stablecoins E-Mode.
Any reason?
I think Aave is going to see major unwinds unless you add sUSDe collateral like previous E-Modes asap.
fyi @ACI

2 Likes

Why can’t the supply market for PT USDE Feb 2026 be increased signfiicantly because of the demand for the pool? The risk modeling of everyone seems on point, could these modals support a significantly higher supply cap?

@ChaosLabs have proposed a direct-to-AIP e-mode modification today. I do the implementation now, so the impact is mitigated.

1 Like